Thursday, December 19, 2013
Now, that WOULD make for an interesting Christmas
9-yo (looking at a flyer in the pile of junk mail): It says you can adopt a snow leopard. How does that work, exactly?
Me: Well, you send a donation to the charity, and they use the money to look after snow leopards. Maintain their habitat. That kind of thing.
9-yo: Oh... I thought you got an actual snow leopard to look after.
Photo credit: National Geographic
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
Chocolate Mingles and Jingles
This post is a review post.
So when I discovered that the Hotel Chocolat website could cope with this, it became my go-to place for presents. After all, who doesn't like receiving chocolate? And it's such high-class chocolate. Tasty, imaginative, a feast for the eyes as well as the taste buds. One thing I love about the website, is that there's a good range of prices. You can give someone a treat without it being ridiculously expensive. I find it the ideal present for a family.
Hotel Chocolat sent me this lovely bag of delights.
A 'Mingles and Jingles Bag' it's called. See? What did I say about "imaginative"? Would you have dreamt up that catchy title? White chocolate bells, dark chocolate penguins, and milk caramel angels, 2 inches tall, individually wrapped, in a pretty sack-ette, plain yet sparkly, that any aspiring Santa would be pleased to be ho-ho-ho-ing down the chimney with. Lovely presentation, and well-packaged, so no worries about boxes arriving through the post bashed and mis-shapen. These people really understand the concept of a luxury gift - but I was also interested to read about their social conscience.
There's a promotion on at the moment on their website. If you spend £60 on chocolates (I know, I know, but if you were buying for several people, perhaps?), you get a free gift sent to your home address.
Yes, Hotel Chocolat definitely gets the Iota seal of approval. This year, a bag of chocolates. Next year, I'm hoping they might want me to review their hotel on the isle of St Lucia.
This was a review post. I received a 'Mingles and Jingles Bag' from Hotel Chocolat, valued £21. The opinions and writing in the review are my own.
.
Thursday, December 5, 2013
You can spot the ones who've lived in the Midwest
The weather forecast predicts snow. I have to go to a supermarket. I have to stock up. Snow coming means you stock up.
I know the snow will be a feeble half inch which will have degenerated into slush by lunchtime. I live about a mile from three different supermarkets, along main roads. I live a 10-minute walk from a petrol station which has a pretty decent shop. But I can't help it. Snow coming means you stock up.
We're going away on Wednesday for 5 days. Between now and then, the children have lots of events on at school - which means they will be having their meals at school instead of dashing home for a quick food stop (one of the great boons of them being day pupils at a boarding school - wonderful flexibility on the dinner front). There is a bag load of sweet treats on the kitchen counter left over from a 'do' Husband organised last night. We are not short of food. But I can't help myself. Snow coming means you stock up.
So just as I found myself explaining to Mid-Westerners that no, I wasn't crazy, but if the sun comes out, you have to get the children out into the garden, even if it's winter and freezing cold, now in the same way, I find myself explaining to the check-out boy in Morrisons that I can't understand why the place isn't packed with people shopping before the snow comes. He looks at me as if I'm a little deranged, but I tell him: "Snow coming means you stock up".
Photo credit: Daily Telegraph
.
I know the snow will be a feeble half inch which will have degenerated into slush by lunchtime. I live about a mile from three different supermarkets, along main roads. I live a 10-minute walk from a petrol station which has a pretty decent shop. But I can't help it. Snow coming means you stock up.
We're going away on Wednesday for 5 days. Between now and then, the children have lots of events on at school - which means they will be having their meals at school instead of dashing home for a quick food stop (one of the great boons of them being day pupils at a boarding school - wonderful flexibility on the dinner front). There is a bag load of sweet treats on the kitchen counter left over from a 'do' Husband organised last night. We are not short of food. But I can't help myself. Snow coming means you stock up.
So just as I found myself explaining to Mid-Westerners that no, I wasn't crazy, but if the sun comes out, you have to get the children out into the garden, even if it's winter and freezing cold, now in the same way, I find myself explaining to the check-out boy in Morrisons that I can't understand why the place isn't packed with people shopping before the snow comes. He looks at me as if I'm a little deranged, but I tell him: "Snow coming means you stock up".
Photo credit: Daily Telegraph
.
Sunday, December 1, 2013
More confessions about classic films
The trouble is, that by the time you get to see a classic film, so many people have raved about it, that your expectations are too high to bear the load. But since I've confessed about It's a Wonderful Life, I might as well go on and confess to my other occasions of failure to see what all the fuss is about.
Casablanca - Bogart is delicious, but what on earth was he doing wasting his affections on that woman, whose name I can't even remember? She wore navy when the nazis wore grey. That's all I can recall about her. It spoilt the whole film, because Bogart clearly deserved better.
Brief Encounter - Now here, it's the other way round. I empathised with Celia Johnson, and the music digs down into the places where heart strings are attached, but what on earth did she see in Trevor Howard?
Gone with the Wind - Total disappointment. Couldn't stay awake during it, and by the end, frankly I couldn't give a damn either. About any of it.
The English Patient - Long and a bit dreary.
Breakfast at Tiffany's - Quite boring.
Star Wars - d'you know? I don't think I've ever actually seen it all the way through.
Dr Zhivago - can't remember much about it, which probably says it all.
Any Disney cartoon. I don't know why. Perhaps it's that I just can't love a cartoon character.
I make an exception for The 101 Dalmatians. Now that's a classic I can still enjoy, because I remember so clearly going to see it when it came out (though I've just looked up when it was released, and it was before I was born, so it must just have been doing the rounds a few years later). I absolutely adored going to our local cinema, the Embassy. The thrill of the vending machine and being allowed to buy something, the excitement of entering the darkness and being shown to your row by an usher with a torch, the red plush chairs that flipped down, the way they squeaked if you sat on the top of them and rocked back and forth, the ba-ba, ba-ba of the Pearl & Dean adverts... All such a treat. My mother was going to drop me and my siblings to see it on our own, but I persuaded her to come too. Secretly, I KNEW I was doing her a favour - I mean, just imagine missing 101 Dalmatians! How could anyone even contemplate that! She kept falling asleep during it, but luckily, I spotted each time, and nudged her awake. I knew she'd be so grateful. In fact, I remember telling her so afterwards. "You must be so pleased that I was sitting next to you, and grateful to me that I kept waking you up!"
I did have to Google "Daddy, My Daddy" after your comments, and you'll be relieved that The Railway Children is not on my list of disappointments. I love that film. (Phew, you're thinking.) My only reservation is the bit that comes just before the "Daddy, My Daddy" bit, where Bobbie, who's being home-schooled, says she's feeling a bit strange, so her mother lets her off lessons for the day. My children were outraged. "Can you imagine what would happen if I said "I'm feeling a bit strange" to the teacher? D'you think I'd get the day off?" They have a point, but let's not nit-pick here.
So what are the other classics that I do love? I'm not a great one for watching the same film over and over again. If I have time to watch a film, I'd almost always prefer to see something new. With that disclaimer, there are a few, though, that are on my personal classics list. In no particular order:
Chitty Chitty Bang Bang
The Sound of Music
Thelma and Louise
Shrek (though I said I couldn't love a cartoon character)
Toy Story
The Full Monty
The Mission
Billy Elliot
The Third Man
lots of the Jane Austen adaptations
Chariots of Fire
Local Hero
The Fugitive
The Shawshank Redemption
Elf (bizarrely)
Love Actually (sorry)
Speed (because Husband once went into a video rental shop and said "We have two small children. My wife is pregnant. Can you recommend a film she will stay awake through? She's a bit fed up with renting videos and not seeing them." I did stay awake through the whole of it, and I do still enjoy watching it.)
And if I had to name a favourite film... tough choice... I think it would be The Full Monty. It makes me laugh every time, and I love the understated warmth of the characters and their relationships. (But please may I add 101 Dalmatians as a favourite children's classic?)
.
Casablanca - Bogart is delicious, but what on earth was he doing wasting his affections on that woman, whose name I can't even remember? She wore navy when the nazis wore grey. That's all I can recall about her. It spoilt the whole film, because Bogart clearly deserved better.
Brief Encounter - Now here, it's the other way round. I empathised with Celia Johnson, and the music digs down into the places where heart strings are attached, but what on earth did she see in Trevor Howard?
Gone with the Wind - Total disappointment. Couldn't stay awake during it, and by the end, frankly I couldn't give a damn either. About any of it.
The English Patient - Long and a bit dreary.
Breakfast at Tiffany's - Quite boring.
Star Wars - d'you know? I don't think I've ever actually seen it all the way through.
Dr Zhivago - can't remember much about it, which probably says it all.
Any Disney cartoon. I don't know why. Perhaps it's that I just can't love a cartoon character.
I make an exception for The 101 Dalmatians. Now that's a classic I can still enjoy, because I remember so clearly going to see it when it came out (though I've just looked up when it was released, and it was before I was born, so it must just have been doing the rounds a few years later). I absolutely adored going to our local cinema, the Embassy. The thrill of the vending machine and being allowed to buy something, the excitement of entering the darkness and being shown to your row by an usher with a torch, the red plush chairs that flipped down, the way they squeaked if you sat on the top of them and rocked back and forth, the ba-ba, ba-ba of the Pearl & Dean adverts... All such a treat. My mother was going to drop me and my siblings to see it on our own, but I persuaded her to come too. Secretly, I KNEW I was doing her a favour - I mean, just imagine missing 101 Dalmatians! How could anyone even contemplate that! She kept falling asleep during it, but luckily, I spotted each time, and nudged her awake. I knew she'd be so grateful. In fact, I remember telling her so afterwards. "You must be so pleased that I was sitting next to you, and grateful to me that I kept waking you up!"
I did have to Google "Daddy, My Daddy" after your comments, and you'll be relieved that The Railway Children is not on my list of disappointments. I love that film. (Phew, you're thinking.) My only reservation is the bit that comes just before the "Daddy, My Daddy" bit, where Bobbie, who's being home-schooled, says she's feeling a bit strange, so her mother lets her off lessons for the day. My children were outraged. "Can you imagine what would happen if I said "I'm feeling a bit strange" to the teacher? D'you think I'd get the day off?" They have a point, but let's not nit-pick here.
So what are the other classics that I do love? I'm not a great one for watching the same film over and over again. If I have time to watch a film, I'd almost always prefer to see something new. With that disclaimer, there are a few, though, that are on my personal classics list. In no particular order:
Chitty Chitty Bang Bang
The Sound of Music
Thelma and Louise
Shrek (though I said I couldn't love a cartoon character)
Toy Story
The Full Monty
The Mission
Billy Elliot
The Third Man
lots of the Jane Austen adaptations
Chariots of Fire
Local Hero
The Fugitive
The Shawshank Redemption
Elf (bizarrely)
Love Actually (sorry)
Speed (because Husband once went into a video rental shop and said "We have two small children. My wife is pregnant. Can you recommend a film she will stay awake through? She's a bit fed up with renting videos and not seeing them." I did stay awake through the whole of it, and I do still enjoy watching it.)
And if I had to name a favourite film... tough choice... I think it would be The Full Monty. It makes me laugh every time, and I love the understated warmth of the characters and their relationships. (But please may I add 101 Dalmatians as a favourite children's classic?)
.
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
Now I'm going to ruin it totally
One of the aspects of blogging that I have long enjoyed is how accepting the blogosphere is. You can hear the taboos tumbling, as bloggers admit to behaviours and attitudes they've previously considered outrageous. Confessions are usually met with variations on the following responses:
Aw, Hon, don't worry. We love you anyway! And in answer to your question, yes, you're totally normal.
I'm SO glad you wrote this post. I'm not alone! I've felt the same for years, but I've never been brave enough to say so out loud. Thank you!
Bloggers are commended for their honesty, sympathy is offered, and the blogosphere absorbs the revelation of this drossy bit of human life, and moves on.
But there must be a limit. There must be things which bloggers confess to, that other people can't condone. There must be moments when lines are crossed, sensibilities offended beyond forgiveness. Moments when bloggers turn their faces... Bloggy Friends, I fear this may be one such.
I don't like the film It's a Wonderful Life. There. I've said it. And there's worse. Not only do I not like it, I really hate it. I've only seen it all the way through once, and then tedious snippets on various other unavoidable occasions. When I did sit all the way through it, I found it boring, pointless, and downright irritating. I thought the central character was dull, and at points a bit creepy. I thought his self-assessment was right, actually. He should have left that insipid and dreary town, and found himself a more interesting life. At the crucial point, he needed Barbie, in one of her many cinematic incarnations, to appear and warble on about following his dreams, believing in himself, trusting his heart. That might have got him moving. As for the angel, he annoyed me immensely. Angels should not be bland. I believe the word "mawkish" was invented for films like this one. It's 130 minutes long, which is approximately 129 minutes too much.
I've heard TWO discussions in the past 24 hours, one on Radio 4 and one on Radio Scotland, about the remake, or sequel, that is imminent. Those radio people were loving it. Lapping it up, they were. "I go every year, with my family, to see it on the big screen, and we're all weeping by the end." "Christmas wouldn't be Christmas without it." "'Every time a bell rings, an angel gets his wings' - that line gets me every time!" I must have heard the word "heart-warming" as many times as is physically possible in the course of a radio segment. The only good thing was the aging actress from Vancouver, who played the daughter in the original film, and is playing an auntie in the sequel, who managed to give away huge chunks of the plot, before the interviewer could intervene. Ha! I enjoyed that bit, thinking of all you It's a Wonderful Life devotees speedily clamping your hands over your ears, but not speedily enough, and howling with distress at having caught a half-sentence too much of what she was saying. Ruined it for you, did she? Ha! (See, I have a dark side...)
Please don't judge me. I can't help it. It's a genetic condition. It's in my DNA. My sister hates the film too. We only have to sing "Buffalo Girls, won't you come out tonight?" to each other, in the knowledge that we are the only two people on the planet who feel this way about the film, to experience a Christmas bonding moment so magical, that I have only one word to describe it. Yes, you guessed it - "heart-warming".
Can you forgive me for my aberrance?
Aw, Hon, don't worry. We love you anyway! And in answer to your question, yes, you're totally normal.
I'm SO glad you wrote this post. I'm not alone! I've felt the same for years, but I've never been brave enough to say so out loud. Thank you!
Bloggers are commended for their honesty, sympathy is offered, and the blogosphere absorbs the revelation of this drossy bit of human life, and moves on.
But there must be a limit. There must be things which bloggers confess to, that other people can't condone. There must be moments when lines are crossed, sensibilities offended beyond forgiveness. Moments when bloggers turn their faces... Bloggy Friends, I fear this may be one such.
I don't like the film It's a Wonderful Life. There. I've said it. And there's worse. Not only do I not like it, I really hate it. I've only seen it all the way through once, and then tedious snippets on various other unavoidable occasions. When I did sit all the way through it, I found it boring, pointless, and downright irritating. I thought the central character was dull, and at points a bit creepy. I thought his self-assessment was right, actually. He should have left that insipid and dreary town, and found himself a more interesting life. At the crucial point, he needed Barbie, in one of her many cinematic incarnations, to appear and warble on about following his dreams, believing in himself, trusting his heart. That might have got him moving. As for the angel, he annoyed me immensely. Angels should not be bland. I believe the word "mawkish" was invented for films like this one. It's 130 minutes long, which is approximately 129 minutes too much.
I've heard TWO discussions in the past 24 hours, one on Radio 4 and one on Radio Scotland, about the remake, or sequel, that is imminent. Those radio people were loving it. Lapping it up, they were. "I go every year, with my family, to see it on the big screen, and we're all weeping by the end." "Christmas wouldn't be Christmas without it." "'Every time a bell rings, an angel gets his wings' - that line gets me every time!" I must have heard the word "heart-warming" as many times as is physically possible in the course of a radio segment. The only good thing was the aging actress from Vancouver, who played the daughter in the original film, and is playing an auntie in the sequel, who managed to give away huge chunks of the plot, before the interviewer could intervene. Ha! I enjoyed that bit, thinking of all you It's a Wonderful Life devotees speedily clamping your hands over your ears, but not speedily enough, and howling with distress at having caught a half-sentence too much of what she was saying. Ruined it for you, did she? Ha! (See, I have a dark side...)
Please don't judge me. I can't help it. It's a genetic condition. It's in my DNA. My sister hates the film too. We only have to sing "Buffalo Girls, won't you come out tonight?" to each other, in the knowledge that we are the only two people on the planet who feel this way about the film, to experience a Christmas bonding moment so magical, that I have only one word to describe it. Yes, you guessed it - "heart-warming".
Can you forgive me for my aberrance?
![]() |
| "Darling, you were right first time. Your life has been pointless and meaningless, and no amount of my smiling at you in black and white can make it better. . |
Labels:
bleugh,
Christmas,
dirty little secrets,
disappointment,
movies
Monday, November 18, 2013
One of the upsides of having had cancer...
... is that you really love your birthdays. I do, anyway.
Last night, Husband took me out for a meal. It's not quite my birthday, but the date worked and logistics seem to dominate life at this point. And I'm not fussy - it doesn't have to be the exact date. I didn't know where we were going. Husband just told me it was going to be nice, and to dress up. It was a posh gig at a very fancy restaurant in town, and there was a bill that I didn't see, but I know was ridiculously large. I don't care. I loved the evening. Loved every minute of it.
I love celebrating that I'm here. "Every year is a bonus," I told Husband. "Every year since 2009 is a bonus." I might not have had these years. That thought, that knowledge, that tremor in my bones, brings with it a deep humility and an exhilaration. I wouldn't have paired those two emotions, but in my experience, they can arrive together and get along nicely. For me they do, every birthday.
I might not have written all these blog posts (and yes, I know I'm meant to be on a blogging break, but it's my blog and I'll write if I want to). I might not have moved house, back across the Atlantic with the family. I might not have seen all those children's concerts and plays, and planned those birthday celebrations. I might not have seen my daughter in a hockey match. I might not have watched The Hunger Games with my son. I might not have helped my oldest choose his GCSE subjects. I might not have owned a dog. I might not have done ALL THAT LAUNDRY! I might not have seen the beauty of this truly fabulous autumn. I might not have been to the Isles of Mull and Skye. Most of all, other people might have carried a yawning gap in their lives.
I couldn't live life with this awareness at the surface all the time. It would be too exhausting, and would alienate me too much from daily life. When I was being treated for cancer, and life was so odd and chaotic and nothing felt right, I missed normal life. I missed it terribly. So I'm happy that the intensity of all that emotion has faded over time, and that life trots along again in its normality. But on my birthday, and at occasional other times, I dip down deep into that pool of gratitude and marvelling that lies at the very bottom of my being, and I drink from its waters. For a while, I truly love that I hate my hairstyle, and that I haven't got round to putting up the new curtains, and that there are always balls of dog hair fluff in the corners of the kitchen, and that I shout at the children when they're being annoying and then feel guilty afterwards, and that the endless untidy family clutter gets me down, not to mention ALL THAT LAUNDRY.
So Cancer, you're a beast, but you've inadvertently given me this gift of glorious birthdays. I love it, and it's a darn good excuse to spend an unseemly amount of money on a restaurant bill.
.
Last night, Husband took me out for a meal. It's not quite my birthday, but the date worked and logistics seem to dominate life at this point. And I'm not fussy - it doesn't have to be the exact date. I didn't know where we were going. Husband just told me it was going to be nice, and to dress up. It was a posh gig at a very fancy restaurant in town, and there was a bill that I didn't see, but I know was ridiculously large. I don't care. I loved the evening. Loved every minute of it.
I love celebrating that I'm here. "Every year is a bonus," I told Husband. "Every year since 2009 is a bonus." I might not have had these years. That thought, that knowledge, that tremor in my bones, brings with it a deep humility and an exhilaration. I wouldn't have paired those two emotions, but in my experience, they can arrive together and get along nicely. For me they do, every birthday.
I might not have written all these blog posts (and yes, I know I'm meant to be on a blogging break, but it's my blog and I'll write if I want to). I might not have moved house, back across the Atlantic with the family. I might not have seen all those children's concerts and plays, and planned those birthday celebrations. I might not have seen my daughter in a hockey match. I might not have watched The Hunger Games with my son. I might not have helped my oldest choose his GCSE subjects. I might not have owned a dog. I might not have done ALL THAT LAUNDRY! I might not have seen the beauty of this truly fabulous autumn. I might not have been to the Isles of Mull and Skye. Most of all, other people might have carried a yawning gap in their lives.
I couldn't live life with this awareness at the surface all the time. It would be too exhausting, and would alienate me too much from daily life. When I was being treated for cancer, and life was so odd and chaotic and nothing felt right, I missed normal life. I missed it terribly. So I'm happy that the intensity of all that emotion has faded over time, and that life trots along again in its normality. But on my birthday, and at occasional other times, I dip down deep into that pool of gratitude and marvelling that lies at the very bottom of my being, and I drink from its waters. For a while, I truly love that I hate my hairstyle, and that I haven't got round to putting up the new curtains, and that there are always balls of dog hair fluff in the corners of the kitchen, and that I shout at the children when they're being annoying and then feel guilty afterwards, and that the endless untidy family clutter gets me down, not to mention ALL THAT LAUNDRY.
So Cancer, you're a beast, but you've inadvertently given me this gift of glorious birthdays. I love it, and it's a darn good excuse to spend an unseemly amount of money on a restaurant bill.
.
Sunday, November 17, 2013
Whatever happened to...
the word "fetch"?
I've long been fascinated by the way language changes. Just how exactly do words come into fashion or go out of fashion?
I'm sure my mother used to fetch me from school, and ask me to fetch something from the kitchen for her. I used the word the other day, and it sounded old-fashioned. Archaic, almost.
Interestingly, I noticed that in America, children are only ever "picked up" from school, and never "collected". I wonder how it sounded to American ears when I (in my early days) talked about "collecting" my children from school. Did I occasionally even talk about "fetching" them? The other mums probably waited till I left the room, and then laughed to each other about how Shakespearean I sounded. "It's so DARLING!" they'd have said.
But back to "fetch"... I also wonder what happened to the word "fetching". I'm sure that word used to be used to mean "charming". Perhaps it was my grandmother rather than my mother, but I definitely remember outfits and appearances being described as "rather fetching".
Poor old "fetch". You've been pushed aside and demoted. Now you're just something I shout vainly at my dog as I throw a ball.
.
I've long been fascinated by the way language changes. Just how exactly do words come into fashion or go out of fashion?
I'm sure my mother used to fetch me from school, and ask me to fetch something from the kitchen for her. I used the word the other day, and it sounded old-fashioned. Archaic, almost.
Interestingly, I noticed that in America, children are only ever "picked up" from school, and never "collected". I wonder how it sounded to American ears when I (in my early days) talked about "collecting" my children from school. Did I occasionally even talk about "fetching" them? The other mums probably waited till I left the room, and then laughed to each other about how Shakespearean I sounded. "It's so DARLING!" they'd have said.
But back to "fetch"... I also wonder what happened to the word "fetching". I'm sure that word used to be used to mean "charming". Perhaps it was my grandmother rather than my mother, but I definitely remember outfits and appearances being described as "rather fetching".
Poor old "fetch". You've been pushed aside and demoted. Now you're just something I shout vainly at my dog as I throw a ball.
.
Saturday, November 9, 2013
How do you sign off emails?
It used to be easy. There were rules.
It got a bit flowery when I did French, and learnt that you have to do lots of bowing and scraping and promising to be cordially someone's servant when you wrote to them.
It got confusing when I went to America, and my children were taught at school how to sign off letters, in ways that I didn't really recognise: Yours truly (well, we Brits take it as read that what we've written is true!) or Sincerely yours (which is just backwards).
But with the advent of email, it's just exploded into complication. When I was at primary school, painstakingly copying out and completing exercises from Pathways to English, they didn't teach me what to do about emails. What is the correct way of signing off an email? (I'm not talking emails to friends here; I'm talking emails to people you don't know but are dealing with on an official or semi-official basis.)
I use Regards if it's a first contact, and Kind regards if it's a few emails down the line and I want to be a little warmer. If I want to step up from that, it's Best wishes, or (really pushing the boat out here) With warmest best wishes - but that's a bit sucky uppy, I feel. I don't often use Yours sincerely or Yours faithfully in emails. Am I right?
I've put the cart before the horse, though. I should have started with email salutations. In a business or official email, is Hi, or Hi there, or Hi Jane, ok? Or are they too informal? Do you say Dear ..., as if the email was a proper letter? Does anyone, anywhere still start off Dear Mr ..., or are we all on first name terms these days?
- If you start a letter with Dear Mr ..., you sign off Yours sincerely.
- If you start a letter with Dear Sir, you sign off Yours faithfully.
It got a bit flowery when I did French, and learnt that you have to do lots of bowing and scraping and promising to be cordially someone's servant when you wrote to them.
It got confusing when I went to America, and my children were taught at school how to sign off letters, in ways that I didn't really recognise: Yours truly (well, we Brits take it as read that what we've written is true!) or Sincerely yours (which is just backwards).
But with the advent of email, it's just exploded into complication. When I was at primary school, painstakingly copying out and completing exercises from Pathways to English, they didn't teach me what to do about emails. What is the correct way of signing off an email? (I'm not talking emails to friends here; I'm talking emails to people you don't know but are dealing with on an official or semi-official basis.)
I use Regards if it's a first contact, and Kind regards if it's a few emails down the line and I want to be a little warmer. If I want to step up from that, it's Best wishes, or (really pushing the boat out here) With warmest best wishes - but that's a bit sucky uppy, I feel. I don't often use Yours sincerely or Yours faithfully in emails. Am I right?
I've put the cart before the horse, though. I should have started with email salutations. In a business or official email, is Hi, or Hi there, or Hi Jane, ok? Or are they too informal? Do you say Dear ..., as if the email was a proper letter? Does anyone, anywhere still start off Dear Mr ..., or are we all on first name terms these days?
Thursday, November 7, 2013
Tea
I think you'll enjoy this video about... Tea!
I was first introduced to Yorkshire Tea at the age of 18 (I'd had a sheltered childhood), when a friend who was from Yorkshire used to bring boxes of it to university to last her the term. In those days you couldn't buy it south of the Humber, and she claimed that you couldn't get a decent brew without it. Yorkshire Tea always makes me think of her.
I didn't get it then, and I don't get it now. I mean, China tea is grown in China. Indian tea is grown in India. Yorkshire tea is... what? Tenderly cultivated on the gentle sun-kissed slopes above the River Swale? Picked in its prime by Yorkshiremen in flat caps on the terraced plantations of the North York Moors? Sorry. Don't get it.
But I DO get this video. It's just so ironic and British and it speaks truth, because, as eny ful no, there really is nothing that can't be sorted out by a nice cup of tea. And we all know that the correct response to that is "Ooh, lovely!".
Disclaimer: I didn't receive anything for posting this video, though I did email the PR company who sent it to me, saying "oh come on, there must be some kind of freebie in this for me", and they said they'd contact Yorkshire Tea on my behalf, so I'm hoping for a year's supply of tea (though I only drink decaff and I don't think Yorkshire does that)... Or maybe a nice red mug... Or a packet of digestives... Or a trip to Yorkshire to visit the plantations...
I was first introduced to Yorkshire Tea at the age of 18 (I'd had a sheltered childhood), when a friend who was from Yorkshire used to bring boxes of it to university to last her the term. In those days you couldn't buy it south of the Humber, and she claimed that you couldn't get a decent brew without it. Yorkshire Tea always makes me think of her.
I didn't get it then, and I don't get it now. I mean, China tea is grown in China. Indian tea is grown in India. Yorkshire tea is... what? Tenderly cultivated on the gentle sun-kissed slopes above the River Swale? Picked in its prime by Yorkshiremen in flat caps on the terraced plantations of the North York Moors? Sorry. Don't get it.
But I DO get this video. It's just so ironic and British and it speaks truth, because, as eny ful no, there really is nothing that can't be sorted out by a nice cup of tea. And we all know that the correct response to that is "Ooh, lovely!".
Disclaimer: I didn't receive anything for posting this video, though I did email the PR company who sent it to me, saying "oh come on, there must be some kind of freebie in this for me", and they said they'd contact Yorkshire Tea on my behalf, so I'm hoping for a year's supply of tea (though I only drink decaff and I don't think Yorkshire does that)... Or maybe a nice red mug... Or a packet of digestives... Or a trip to Yorkshire to visit the plantations...
Wednesday, October 30, 2013
Dog poo
Ye-e-e-es, I thought that would get you reading.
While the rest of the blogosphere is bursting with Hallowe'en spook, I break my blogging silence to bring you my reflections on one of life's imponderable questions.
Why is dog poo brown?
And specifically, why is it brown, in autumn?
We dog owners, we have a hard life. If the dog is squatting, unless we fix our eyes on the exact spot, and march swiftly to said spot, without looking to left or right, or even blinking, we will find ourselves looking for a poo among multi-coloured-but-all-of-them-a-variation-of-brown fallen leaves, which said activity makes looking for a needle in a haystack seems as easy as pie. Incidentally, that's a ridiculous metaphor, because baking a good pie is actually very hard, as any Great British Bake Off viewer will tell you.
But, dear Bloggy Friends, here is the magic of blogging. I present this as a problem, and then I turn it into a business opportunity! Ta-da! I am going to invent some kind of non-toxic food colouring that shows up in poo in a neon colour. It's probably been done already. The medics love that kind of thing, don't they? They're always putting odd substances inside you and then filming it, or scanning it, or chopping it up. I'm going to patent a dog food that produces neon glow results!
Better still, I'm going to find a way of putting into dog food that infra-red (or is it ultra-violet?) substance that they use to stop bank note forgery. It's ultra-violet, isn't it? Not infra-red. No. Anyway, where was I? Then I'll sell some kind of wand-y thing, that dog owners can wave over the ground, to locate the purple poo. This is better than the neon glowing poo, because the poo will remain invisible to the general public, and only be visible to the guilty dog owner. We don't really want the parks of Britain to be littered with neon splodges, though our trainers and wellies might thank us for it. It wouldn't be very sightly. Although let's get back to the seasonal subject of Hallowe'en here. Dotting the park with neon splodges would actually be a rather Hallowe'eny thing to do, wouldn't it? It would really put the poo into spooky (see what I... never mind).
OK. Back to blogging silence. Enjoy Hallowe'en!
.
While the rest of the blogosphere is bursting with Hallowe'en spook, I break my blogging silence to bring you my reflections on one of life's imponderable questions.
Why is dog poo brown?
And specifically, why is it brown, in autumn?
We dog owners, we have a hard life. If the dog is squatting, unless we fix our eyes on the exact spot, and march swiftly to said spot, without looking to left or right, or even blinking, we will find ourselves looking for a poo among multi-coloured-but-all-of-them-a-variation-of-brown fallen leaves, which said activity makes looking for a needle in a haystack seems as easy as pie. Incidentally, that's a ridiculous metaphor, because baking a good pie is actually very hard, as any Great British Bake Off viewer will tell you.
But, dear Bloggy Friends, here is the magic of blogging. I present this as a problem, and then I turn it into a business opportunity! Ta-da! I am going to invent some kind of non-toxic food colouring that shows up in poo in a neon colour. It's probably been done already. The medics love that kind of thing, don't they? They're always putting odd substances inside you and then filming it, or scanning it, or chopping it up. I'm going to patent a dog food that produces neon glow results!
Better still, I'm going to find a way of putting into dog food that infra-red (or is it ultra-violet?) substance that they use to stop bank note forgery. It's ultra-violet, isn't it? Not infra-red. No. Anyway, where was I? Then I'll sell some kind of wand-y thing, that dog owners can wave over the ground, to locate the purple poo. This is better than the neon glowing poo, because the poo will remain invisible to the general public, and only be visible to the guilty dog owner. We don't really want the parks of Britain to be littered with neon splodges, though our trainers and wellies might thank us for it. It wouldn't be very sightly. Although let's get back to the seasonal subject of Hallowe'en here. Dotting the park with neon splodges would actually be a rather Hallowe'eny thing to do, wouldn't it? It would really put the poo into spooky (see what I... never mind).
OK. Back to blogging silence. Enjoy Hallowe'en!
.
Monday, October 7, 2013
Textpat Mum
Still on my blogging break, but just had to share this story with you.
The way technology makes decisions for you annoys me. For example, I can't drive my car unless I am wearing the seat belt. This is annoying if I've parked, undone the seat belt, and then decide I'd like to edge forward another inch or two. The car just won't move, unless I buckle up again.
Another example: my phone automatically uploaded all my google contacts, even though I never asked it to. This is rubbish, because it means that I have a large number of contacts, whereas I only use the phone for calls and texts to people in my immediate life. (No, I'm not boasting about that number of contacts; it's just that the phone has uploaded anyone, everyone, who's ever sent me an email to which I've replied - or that's what it seems like).
Thus it was, dear Bloggy Friends, that one of my Bloggy Friends who lives in Chicago received a short burst of texts from me today:
"How about john n natasha? freya in poppy's class"
"McNabs? two daughters and know the andersons. u like peter who talks to u after chapel. wrights? john and roger wld get on"
"So how about smithsons collingwoods andersons and wrights?"
Poor Expat Mum was a little confused, until the final one shed just a little light:
"cld u find out when guest night is and if too late to take 6 or 8 places"
and she realised that it was me, trying to text my husband, whose name (without giving away any anonymity here) might mean that he is next to her in my contacts list.
Oh, and while we're on the subject of annoying technology, what about spell-checkers? In an email chat with another Bloggy Friend this afternoon, I was amused when she told me that having her sons at different schools worked out ok, "but it's a piano when it comes to pickup".
The way technology makes decisions for you annoys me. For example, I can't drive my car unless I am wearing the seat belt. This is annoying if I've parked, undone the seat belt, and then decide I'd like to edge forward another inch or two. The car just won't move, unless I buckle up again.
Another example: my phone automatically uploaded all my google contacts, even though I never asked it to. This is rubbish, because it means that I have a large number of contacts, whereas I only use the phone for calls and texts to people in my immediate life. (No, I'm not boasting about that number of contacts; it's just that the phone has uploaded anyone, everyone, who's ever sent me an email to which I've replied - or that's what it seems like).
Thus it was, dear Bloggy Friends, that one of my Bloggy Friends who lives in Chicago received a short burst of texts from me today:
"How about john n natasha? freya in poppy's class"
"McNabs? two daughters and know the andersons. u like peter who talks to u after chapel. wrights? john and roger wld get on"
"So how about smithsons collingwoods andersons and wrights?"
Poor Expat Mum was a little confused, until the final one shed just a little light:
"cld u find out when guest night is and if too late to take 6 or 8 places"
and she realised that it was me, trying to text my husband, whose name (without giving away any anonymity here) might mean that he is next to her in my contacts list.
Oh, and while we're on the subject of annoying technology, what about spell-checkers? In an email chat with another Bloggy Friend this afternoon, I was amused when she told me that having her sons at different schools worked out ok, "but it's a piano when it comes to pickup".
Thursday, September 19, 2013
I do what it says on the tin
OK, Bloggy Friends, so I'm going to take a wee blogging breakette. I do it from time to time, and I always return, and I'm always glad I did it.
The new job is going well, but seriously curtails the number of hours I have to do other things. So it might be a choice between feeding my children or blogging, and I know what you'd all tell me to do. At least, I think I do.
Meanwhile, a friend of mine sent me this photo.
It's a new game from Gamewright. Come on, Gamewright, send me one, and I'll review it for you. It would be fun! I always liked Gamewright games when I worked in the toy shop.
According to Gamewright's website, Iota is Mensa Select (does that mean "selected by Mensa"?) and is "the pocket-sized game that's big time fun". Yay, Iota!
Apparently, Iota reinforces
The new job is going well, but seriously curtails the number of hours I have to do other things. So it might be a choice between feeding my children or blogging, and I know what you'd all tell me to do. At least, I think I do.
Meanwhile, a friend of mine sent me this photo.
It's a new game from Gamewright. Come on, Gamewright, send me one, and I'll review it for you. It would be fun! I always liked Gamewright games when I worked in the toy shop.
According to Gamewright's website, Iota is Mensa Select (does that mean "selected by Mensa"?) and is "the pocket-sized game that's big time fun". Yay, Iota!
Apparently, Iota reinforces
- Spatial Relations
- Visual Discrimination
- Strategic Thinking
Go, me!
Please don't delete Iota (the great big blog in the teeny-weeny tin) from your feeders and readers, and I'll see you on the other side of the break.
.
Friday, September 13, 2013
Something that annoys me
Something that annoys me is when a café has signs to its toilets that are anything other than Gents/Ladies, or Men/Women, or a simple visual representation thereof. (I love the word "thereof".)
You, oh café owner, might think you are being cute, or clever, or witty, or enhancing the themed design of your café. But to anyone with children who are old enough to go to the loo on their own, but not old enough to interpret which the right loo is from your oh-so-amusing signage, you are an annoyance. You are the difference between me enjoying a cup of coffee in peace, and me having to get up, leave the table, walk across the café, and interpret loo signs with a child, when I don't even need to go to the loo myself. That is annoying.
This applies to you, if you are the owner of the cafés I've been in where the loos are designated:
I've been noticing them for several years now - ever since my oldest reached toilet-independence age. Have you seen any annoying ones recently? Can't we just stick to something like this one here?
You, oh café owner, might think you are being cute, or clever, or witty, or enhancing the themed design of your café. But to anyone with children who are old enough to go to the loo on their own, but not old enough to interpret which the right loo is from your oh-so-amusing signage, you are an annoyance. You are the difference between me enjoying a cup of coffee in peace, and me having to get up, leave the table, walk across the café, and interpret loo signs with a child, when I don't even need to go to the loo myself. That is annoying.
This applies to you, if you are the owner of the cafés I've been in where the loos are designated:
- M/F
- Bruces/Sheilas (ok, so that one was in an Australian-themed restaurant, but couldn't there be easy-to-understand signs as well as the atmosphere-enhancing titles?)
- Messieurs/Mesdames (same point)
- A picture of a deer's head with antlers/A picture of deer's head without antlers
- A moustache/A symbol that looked like a head with a pony tail - but who knows?
- A man's shoe/A woman's shoe
- The circle with the arrow pointing North East/The circle with the cross at the bottom (what ARE those symbols called? Is it Mars and Venus? And I bet there's a café somewhere with signs saying Mars and Venus on the toilet doors too.)
I've been noticing them for several years now - ever since my oldest reached toilet-independence age. Have you seen any annoying ones recently? Can't we just stick to something like this one here?
.
Monday, September 9, 2013
Driving Miss Iota: Part 3, in which I reach the crux of the matter
I don't like motorway driving either. In fact, it's motorway driving that makes me most anxious. Driving in town, any bumps you may have are likely to be fairly low impact (not always, I know, but usually). But on the motorway, it's a different story.
Last time I was driving on a motorway (a couple of weeks ago), I found myself feeling really quite agitated. This is not good, I thought. So I kept calm, breathed regularly and deeply, and the moment slowly passed. Then I started digging around in myself. Why is this becoming a problem? I was in a car crash 8 years ago. Is it something to do with that? The more I thought about it, and tried to get in touch with whatever goes on at my gut level, the more I realised that this isn't about me and my driving. It's about 16-yo.
You know those mothers who tell you, when you're short of sleep, up to your elbows in dirty nappies, and trying to settle a fractious baby while keeping a busy toddler amused at a table in a café, "just wait till they're teenagers"? You know them? Well, they do have a point.
I've spent years of my life, at a conscious level and at an unconscious level, waking and sleeping, keeping my children safe. It's part of the very fabric of my being. It's what I do. It's second nature, and third, and fourth, fifth, sixth. I protect them from harm.
I've supported their necks when picking them up, covered electric sockets, put kettles out of reach, used 5-point harnesses, understood what an isofix fitting is, purchased shin pads, strapped on helmets, and not let them put things round their necks. I've taught them how to cross a street, to walk carefully by the side of a swimming pool, to check the depth of water before diving in, not to talk to strangers, not to play with sharp knives, matches and electrical items. I've cut grapes into safely chewable halves, stopped them putting marbles in their mouths, moved furniture away from upstairs windows, kept plastic bags in a high cupboard, not left them alone in the bath, not allowed them to squash pillows over each other's faces, phoned GPs in the night, written my mobile number on their wrists, and held their hands when walking along pavements by busy traffic. Busy traffic. Whoa. Stop right there.
Now, it seems, I will soon need to stand back, while one of them takes control of a small metal box, which travels at speeds which can only be described as ludicrous when you think about the softness of the human body inside, and let him hurtle across the land in extremely close proximity to other small metal boxes, all of which are controlled by mere mortals, the majority of whom mean well but inevitably suffer from lapses in concentration and errors of judgment, and a small minority of whom are raving lunatics who can't tell the difference between the length of a car and the length of their own body appendages, if the distance between their front bumper and my back bumper in the outside lane of a motorway is anything to go by. It's a far cry from the 5-point harness.
I can sense that my recent anxiety about driving is anxiety about letting my oldest drive. I know I have to, and I know I will, but, Bloggy Friends who've travelled this road already, how on earth do I do this?
.
Last time I was driving on a motorway (a couple of weeks ago), I found myself feeling really quite agitated. This is not good, I thought. So I kept calm, breathed regularly and deeply, and the moment slowly passed. Then I started digging around in myself. Why is this becoming a problem? I was in a car crash 8 years ago. Is it something to do with that? The more I thought about it, and tried to get in touch with whatever goes on at my gut level, the more I realised that this isn't about me and my driving. It's about 16-yo.
You know those mothers who tell you, when you're short of sleep, up to your elbows in dirty nappies, and trying to settle a fractious baby while keeping a busy toddler amused at a table in a café, "just wait till they're teenagers"? You know them? Well, they do have a point.
I've spent years of my life, at a conscious level and at an unconscious level, waking and sleeping, keeping my children safe. It's part of the very fabric of my being. It's what I do. It's second nature, and third, and fourth, fifth, sixth. I protect them from harm.
I've supported their necks when picking them up, covered electric sockets, put kettles out of reach, used 5-point harnesses, understood what an isofix fitting is, purchased shin pads, strapped on helmets, and not let them put things round their necks. I've taught them how to cross a street, to walk carefully by the side of a swimming pool, to check the depth of water before diving in, not to talk to strangers, not to play with sharp knives, matches and electrical items. I've cut grapes into safely chewable halves, stopped them putting marbles in their mouths, moved furniture away from upstairs windows, kept plastic bags in a high cupboard, not left them alone in the bath, not allowed them to squash pillows over each other's faces, phoned GPs in the night, written my mobile number on their wrists, and held their hands when walking along pavements by busy traffic. Busy traffic. Whoa. Stop right there.
Now, it seems, I will soon need to stand back, while one of them takes control of a small metal box, which travels at speeds which can only be described as ludicrous when you think about the softness of the human body inside, and let him hurtle across the land in extremely close proximity to other small metal boxes, all of which are controlled by mere mortals, the majority of whom mean well but inevitably suffer from lapses in concentration and errors of judgment, and a small minority of whom are raving lunatics who can't tell the difference between the length of a car and the length of their own body appendages, if the distance between their front bumper and my back bumper in the outside lane of a motorway is anything to go by. It's a far cry from the 5-point harness.
I can sense that my recent anxiety about driving is anxiety about letting my oldest drive. I know I have to, and I know I will, but, Bloggy Friends who've travelled this road already, how on earth do I do this?
.
Labels:
16-yo,
bumpy road of life,
cars,
driving,
motherhood,
parenthood
Wednesday, September 4, 2013
Driving Miss Iota: Part 2
I've thought of another manoeuvre that seems to have changed since I was taught to drive.
Imagine you are at a crossroads (literal, not figurative). You are turning right. Someone coming in the opposite direction is also turning to their right. When I learnt to drive, the correct thing to do was to wait in the middle of the junction, with the other car parallel on your right hand side, and then go round the back of each other when there was a gap in the oncoming traffic, or when the lights changed. Hard to describe, but if you imagine the two cars to be like dogs, sniffing each other's bottoms, you'll get the picture.
Now, a lot of junctions have arrows and lane markings, indicating that you shouldn't go round the back of the oncoming vehicle, but pass in front of them. But if there aren't any arrows and markings, what's the rule? It seems to be that you go in front, and usually you have to, because the volume of traffic means that it's not just one car turning right in each direction, but a whole string of them. But has the rule changed, or just practice?
Meanwhile, I was browsing through the book I used to keep of conversations with the kids that I wanted to remember, and I found some words on the subject of driving from my daughter, when she was 4.
"When I'm an adult, you'll have to help me to drive. Then when I've got good at it, I can move away and live in my own house and get married. And then I can teach the person I married to drive too. Is that what you did when you got married?"
.
Imagine you are at a crossroads (literal, not figurative). You are turning right. Someone coming in the opposite direction is also turning to their right. When I learnt to drive, the correct thing to do was to wait in the middle of the junction, with the other car parallel on your right hand side, and then go round the back of each other when there was a gap in the oncoming traffic, or when the lights changed. Hard to describe, but if you imagine the two cars to be like dogs, sniffing each other's bottoms, you'll get the picture.
Now, a lot of junctions have arrows and lane markings, indicating that you shouldn't go round the back of the oncoming vehicle, but pass in front of them. But if there aren't any arrows and markings, what's the rule? It seems to be that you go in front, and usually you have to, because the volume of traffic means that it's not just one car turning right in each direction, but a whole string of them. But has the rule changed, or just practice?
Meanwhile, I was browsing through the book I used to keep of conversations with the kids that I wanted to remember, and I found some words on the subject of driving from my daughter, when she was 4.
"When I'm an adult, you'll have to help me to drive. Then when I've got good at it, I can move away and live in my own house and get married. And then I can teach the person I married to drive too. Is that what you did when you got married?"
.
Thursday, August 29, 2013
Driving Miss Iota: Part 1
I'm thinking of having one or two advanced driving lessons. (Thinking about it, in that way that I suspect that I'd like to do it, but won't quite get round to it, because it will never reach the very top of the priorities list.) I'm losing confidence in driving, and I don't want it to get worse.
I used to love city driving. Nipping in and out of busy traffic in my little Vauxhall Nova, being able to parallel park in the teensiest of tiny spaces, being assertive enough to be a little cheeky, but not pushing it too much. I still enjoy city driving, but I'm aware that I'm not as sharp as I used to be. And I think it's got more difficult. There's more going on. You have more gizmos on your dashboard (and I don't even use the Bluetooth phone thingy), and a GPS bossing you around.
Life is more complicated. It used to be me, the Nova, and the open road. Now it's me, the GPS, children who want to know stuff about where we're going and why, iPods which want to play their music through the sound system and can only do so if I scroll down some menu or other, and the dog in his crate, which slides back and forth if I brake too quickly, reminding me that I really should remember to wedge that crate with an old blanket.
Cars are definitely more complicated. For example, I was taught what to do if you stall. Handbrake on, into neutral, turn the ignition key. But our car restarts automatically, though it sometimes doesn't (presumably if I'm still in gear). It takes me a moment to work out what it's doing and why, and really it would be much simpler if it just languished in stall mode and allowed me to sort things out. I want to be in control of my own destiny, rather than be forced to hand it over to a bunch of VW engineers in a design room in Germany, however vorsprung durch technik they may be.
Life, cars, and of course traffic also is more complicated. Remember roundabouts in the old days? You used to drive up, stop, make sure nothing was coming to your right, and then proceed. Now, you can't stop. Oh no. You have to slow down, and filter out. Otherwise you cause all kinds of anguish. Roundabouts aren't even round any more. Lots of them have multiple lanes, with traffic lights, and arrows, and all kinds of un-roundabouty distractions. I know roundabouts that have mini roundabouts around them (Hello, Hemel Hempstead). Some of the bigger ones have roadways through the middle of them (looking at you, Headington on the Oxford bypass), and so the sign that tells you which lane to be in looks like something you need A level Physics to understand. In the two seconds you have as you drive by it.
Traffic is faster, and you have less reaction time. Do they still teach learner drivers to look over their shoulders before pulling out, or is it all done with mirrors these days? I remember that not checking over your shoulder was something you could fail your test on, but now there really isn't time. By the time you've rotated your neck backwards and forwards, two lorries, a bus and five cars have whizzed past.
I feel the rules have changed, and I've not quite kept up. That's why I'd like a lesson or two. In fact, I rather think everyone should have a course of refresher lessons every 15 years. Why not? Wouldn't that be a good idea?
I was talking about this with a friend. "I'd like to feel 100% confident that I know what I'm doing," I said. "I'd like to be behind the wheel, driving along, feeling in full control, knowing that I know exactly how I should be driving and what I should be doing in any situation."
"You mean you want to be a man?" he replied. "We feel like that when we drive."
See what I mean? A refresher course every 15 years could be a good idea for everyone.
.
I used to love city driving. Nipping in and out of busy traffic in my little Vauxhall Nova, being able to parallel park in the teensiest of tiny spaces, being assertive enough to be a little cheeky, but not pushing it too much. I still enjoy city driving, but I'm aware that I'm not as sharp as I used to be. And I think it's got more difficult. There's more going on. You have more gizmos on your dashboard (and I don't even use the Bluetooth phone thingy), and a GPS bossing you around.
Life is more complicated. It used to be me, the Nova, and the open road. Now it's me, the GPS, children who want to know stuff about where we're going and why, iPods which want to play their music through the sound system and can only do so if I scroll down some menu or other, and the dog in his crate, which slides back and forth if I brake too quickly, reminding me that I really should remember to wedge that crate with an old blanket.
Cars are definitely more complicated. For example, I was taught what to do if you stall. Handbrake on, into neutral, turn the ignition key. But our car restarts automatically, though it sometimes doesn't (presumably if I'm still in gear). It takes me a moment to work out what it's doing and why, and really it would be much simpler if it just languished in stall mode and allowed me to sort things out. I want to be in control of my own destiny, rather than be forced to hand it over to a bunch of VW engineers in a design room in Germany, however vorsprung durch technik they may be.
Life, cars, and of course traffic also is more complicated. Remember roundabouts in the old days? You used to drive up, stop, make sure nothing was coming to your right, and then proceed. Now, you can't stop. Oh no. You have to slow down, and filter out. Otherwise you cause all kinds of anguish. Roundabouts aren't even round any more. Lots of them have multiple lanes, with traffic lights, and arrows, and all kinds of un-roundabouty distractions. I know roundabouts that have mini roundabouts around them (Hello, Hemel Hempstead). Some of the bigger ones have roadways through the middle of them (looking at you, Headington on the Oxford bypass), and so the sign that tells you which lane to be in looks like something you need A level Physics to understand. In the two seconds you have as you drive by it.
Traffic is faster, and you have less reaction time. Do they still teach learner drivers to look over their shoulders before pulling out, or is it all done with mirrors these days? I remember that not checking over your shoulder was something you could fail your test on, but now there really isn't time. By the time you've rotated your neck backwards and forwards, two lorries, a bus and five cars have whizzed past.
I feel the rules have changed, and I've not quite kept up. That's why I'd like a lesson or two. In fact, I rather think everyone should have a course of refresher lessons every 15 years. Why not? Wouldn't that be a good idea?
I was talking about this with a friend. "I'd like to feel 100% confident that I know what I'm doing," I said. "I'd like to be behind the wheel, driving along, feeling in full control, knowing that I know exactly how I should be driving and what I should be doing in any situation."
"You mean you want to be a man?" he replied. "We feel like that when we drive."
See what I mean? A refresher course every 15 years could be a good idea for everyone.
.
Tuesday, August 27, 2013
It's been a year
We've been back a good year now. Back in the UK. The school year is starting again, and we've commented several times to each other, and to other people, how nice it is not to be newbies. The uniforms are sorted out, the relevant bits of paper read and signed, the calendar perused and any event in the next week or so noted, if I need to do something about it in advance. Otherwise, the kids will just roll up, and the next year will begin. It's a great feeling, to be established and not at sea. I've told my children to be specially nice to any new kids, and I know they will.
I'm happy to be here. We're in a good spot. We've made our house our home, found our way around a new city, made friends, had visitors to stay. My new job feels feels like another piece of the jigsaw is filled in. The picture has taken shape. I wouldn't change it, but as the year milestone is passed, I feel a little sad. It's beginning to feel like our time in America was a long time ago - another life, almost. I know other expats have said this, so I know I'm not alone. It's a strange feeling. I'm happy to be here, and when we were in America, we spent a huge amount of time, energy and emotion on trying to get here. But I left part of myself behind (quite literally, actually...).
I was shopping with 9-yo the other day, and I stopped and said "Do you remember when we used to go shopping at 'The Children's Place' together?" She nodded, and the expression on her face changed to sadness. We had a conversation about missing The Children's Place, and that made me feel better. It's part of her life too, and always will be. It took me such a long time to think of my children's sojourn in America as gain, rather than loss. I spent the first year or two thinking about all they were missing out on here. Now, for all that their current lives here are full and rich, I find myself thinking about what they are missing there.
Part of what I'm feeling is the oddness that I've made some very good new friends over the past year, but that they don't know about my having had cancer. It's not the first thing you talk about, and then as time goes by, it seems like it would be awkward to say "oh, and I don't think I've ever mentioned that I was treated for breast cancer four years ago". In a way, it doesn't matter. I am who I am in this moment, meeting people who are who they are in this moment. But in another way, it feels like it's almost become a big secret. I don't really want that. I realise that everyone, at my stage of life, will have events from their past that are significant, and that not all their friends know about. We all have things tucked away at the back of our kitchen cupboards, as it were. It's just that the cancer episode takes up a lot of cupboard space, and I don't like it being so hidden. Though I sort of do, too. I like how much it isn't part of everyday life as it used to be. There's no pleasing me at the moment! I suppose moving on involves gain and loss. You can't have one without the other.
Meanwhile, 9-yo and I are very much enjoying The Great British Bake Off. We look forward to Tuesday evening, and I love sharing that hour with her. Seems like a good trade-off for losing our trips to The Children's Place (though I did like that shop!)
I'm happy to be here. We're in a good spot. We've made our house our home, found our way around a new city, made friends, had visitors to stay. My new job feels feels like another piece of the jigsaw is filled in. The picture has taken shape. I wouldn't change it, but as the year milestone is passed, I feel a little sad. It's beginning to feel like our time in America was a long time ago - another life, almost. I know other expats have said this, so I know I'm not alone. It's a strange feeling. I'm happy to be here, and when we were in America, we spent a huge amount of time, energy and emotion on trying to get here. But I left part of myself behind (quite literally, actually...).
I was shopping with 9-yo the other day, and I stopped and said "Do you remember when we used to go shopping at 'The Children's Place' together?" She nodded, and the expression on her face changed to sadness. We had a conversation about missing The Children's Place, and that made me feel better. It's part of her life too, and always will be. It took me such a long time to think of my children's sojourn in America as gain, rather than loss. I spent the first year or two thinking about all they were missing out on here. Now, for all that their current lives here are full and rich, I find myself thinking about what they are missing there.
Part of what I'm feeling is the oddness that I've made some very good new friends over the past year, but that they don't know about my having had cancer. It's not the first thing you talk about, and then as time goes by, it seems like it would be awkward to say "oh, and I don't think I've ever mentioned that I was treated for breast cancer four years ago". In a way, it doesn't matter. I am who I am in this moment, meeting people who are who they are in this moment. But in another way, it feels like it's almost become a big secret. I don't really want that. I realise that everyone, at my stage of life, will have events from their past that are significant, and that not all their friends know about. We all have things tucked away at the back of our kitchen cupboards, as it were. It's just that the cancer episode takes up a lot of cupboard space, and I don't like it being so hidden. Though I sort of do, too. I like how much it isn't part of everyday life as it used to be. There's no pleasing me at the moment! I suppose moving on involves gain and loss. You can't have one without the other.
Meanwhile, 9-yo and I are very much enjoying The Great British Bake Off. We look forward to Tuesday evening, and I love sharing that hour with her. Seems like a good trade-off for losing our trips to The Children's Place (though I did like that shop!)
Tuesday, August 20, 2013
Well, this is all very exciting
I've got a job. Yes, seriously. A proper one, with hours and pay and that kind of thing.
I've been applying for things for a few weeks, and I've had interviews with three places (and turned down a fourth), which I was pretty amazed about. To me, my cv reads something like "used to be fairly employable, but ppff, just look at how long she's been out of the working world, and she didn't exactly achieve much really, did she?". Obviously it didn't read quite like that to them. Which is just as well, because the job I have is Fundraising and Communications, and frankly, if you can't massage your own cv to read well, then you're not going to be any good at Communications (whatever that is).
My professional background was in the Civil Service (5 years and a bit), and then Fundraising with 3 large national charities (6 years and a bit). So I've been looking at fundraising jobs and administrative jobs. I'm very glad to have got a fundraising one, though, as I spend way too much of my life doing admin things already (don't we all?). Fundraising is a bit more of its own role. Most admin jobs that I was applying for were to make things happen for someone else, and I have to say, I'm more than ready to have my own patch. I had an interview for a PA job, and though it would have been good in all kinds of ways, I did find myself sitting in the interview trying hard to persuade myself that it wouldn't feel rather like being a mum in an office. It's bad enough having children, a husband and a spaniel. Not sure I want a boss with a life to organise too.
The job I've got (one might even say "my job" *beams with pride*) is with a small Family Centre in one of the disadvantaged areas of the city. I went to have an informal look around when I saw the job ad, and I liked it from the off. It had a buzz about the place. It has a creche, a cafe, and then runs all kind of useful activities: cooking classes (with the emphasis on healthy eating), kids' holiday clubs, support groups, housing advice sessions, counselling, a vegetable garden in the back yard (the produce being used in the cafe) etc. I liked the fact that there is a good number of volunteers involved, staffing the front desk and elsewhere. That always speaks well of an organisation, I reckon.
The job is 16 hours a week, and it can be pretty flexible how that is arranged. It's a 15 minute drive or bus ride from home. The role is fairly clearly defined, but with room for growth (ie I'll do a bit of Fundraising, and then wonder how to set about Communications). I'll be in a small team, which, I know, I know, can be a nightmare, but also can be nice. I'm not sure I'm a big organisations person any more.
It will mean change for our family life. I am lucky to have no childcare issues, as the kids start school early, and can stay late when necessary for prep and dinner (which is a big advantage of boarding school life - what's more, there's no extra charge, and I don't even have to sign up in advance, just on the day). Husband has holidays free (mostly), so can be in charge on the days I work. Those are huge advantages, and I don't underestimate them. However, I'm sure it will be something of an adjustment, and I've already had a conversation and a cuddle with 9-yo, who tearily told me "I don't want you not to be here in the holidays". Yes, there will be a little loss, but, both for me and for the family, there will be big gain. We'll have a second income (when did Britain get SO DARN EXPENSIVE?), and I'm looking forward to having something to get my teeth into. I've spent a year settling us all into our new home and our new life, and I'm ready to be out there with a new challenge. Living and working in a boarding school can be a bit like being in a bubble. It was tempting to see if I could offer my services to the school (various spouses do have jobs here), but I knew I wanted something outside the bubble. The thing I like most about this job (and I think you'll understand this), is that it's mine. All mine.
I just rang up a moment ago to talk about a minor detail, couldn't speak to the person I needed to, and so chatted briefly to the receptionist. She said "Well, I hope you make a decent cup of tea", so I'm sure I'll fit right in. An organisation which values that particular skill is bound to be worth working for. And my reply? I said, "I make a darn good cup of tea". Which I do.
.
I've been applying for things for a few weeks, and I've had interviews with three places (and turned down a fourth), which I was pretty amazed about. To me, my cv reads something like "used to be fairly employable, but ppff, just look at how long she's been out of the working world, and she didn't exactly achieve much really, did she?". Obviously it didn't read quite like that to them. Which is just as well, because the job I have is Fundraising and Communications, and frankly, if you can't massage your own cv to read well, then you're not going to be any good at Communications (whatever that is).
My professional background was in the Civil Service (5 years and a bit), and then Fundraising with 3 large national charities (6 years and a bit). So I've been looking at fundraising jobs and administrative jobs. I'm very glad to have got a fundraising one, though, as I spend way too much of my life doing admin things already (don't we all?). Fundraising is a bit more of its own role. Most admin jobs that I was applying for were to make things happen for someone else, and I have to say, I'm more than ready to have my own patch. I had an interview for a PA job, and though it would have been good in all kinds of ways, I did find myself sitting in the interview trying hard to persuade myself that it wouldn't feel rather like being a mum in an office. It's bad enough having children, a husband and a spaniel. Not sure I want a boss with a life to organise too.
The job I've got (one might even say "my job" *beams with pride*) is with a small Family Centre in one of the disadvantaged areas of the city. I went to have an informal look around when I saw the job ad, and I liked it from the off. It had a buzz about the place. It has a creche, a cafe, and then runs all kind of useful activities: cooking classes (with the emphasis on healthy eating), kids' holiday clubs, support groups, housing advice sessions, counselling, a vegetable garden in the back yard (the produce being used in the cafe) etc. I liked the fact that there is a good number of volunteers involved, staffing the front desk and elsewhere. That always speaks well of an organisation, I reckon.
The job is 16 hours a week, and it can be pretty flexible how that is arranged. It's a 15 minute drive or bus ride from home. The role is fairly clearly defined, but with room for growth (ie I'll do a bit of Fundraising, and then wonder how to set about Communications). I'll be in a small team, which, I know, I know, can be a nightmare, but also can be nice. I'm not sure I'm a big organisations person any more.
It will mean change for our family life. I am lucky to have no childcare issues, as the kids start school early, and can stay late when necessary for prep and dinner (which is a big advantage of boarding school life - what's more, there's no extra charge, and I don't even have to sign up in advance, just on the day). Husband has holidays free (mostly), so can be in charge on the days I work. Those are huge advantages, and I don't underestimate them. However, I'm sure it will be something of an adjustment, and I've already had a conversation and a cuddle with 9-yo, who tearily told me "I don't want you not to be here in the holidays". Yes, there will be a little loss, but, both for me and for the family, there will be big gain. We'll have a second income (when did Britain get SO DARN EXPENSIVE?), and I'm looking forward to having something to get my teeth into. I've spent a year settling us all into our new home and our new life, and I'm ready to be out there with a new challenge. Living and working in a boarding school can be a bit like being in a bubble. It was tempting to see if I could offer my services to the school (various spouses do have jobs here), but I knew I wanted something outside the bubble. The thing I like most about this job (and I think you'll understand this), is that it's mine. All mine.
I just rang up a moment ago to talk about a minor detail, couldn't speak to the person I needed to, and so chatted briefly to the receptionist. She said "Well, I hope you make a decent cup of tea", so I'm sure I'll fit right in. An organisation which values that particular skill is bound to be worth working for. And my reply? I said, "I make a darn good cup of tea". Which I do.
.
Update on roof bars
I took down that last post, and if you're wondering why, it was because I said I was giving Thule the right of reply, but then I didn't. That offended my ethical blogging sensibilities.
A couple of further details of the story may amuse you, though.
We arrived at the village in Oxfordshire where my cousin lives, from whom we were reclaiming the roof box whilst conscientiously not finishing our sentences with prepositions. We'd set off from Brighton at 5.30am (it's a long way to Edinburgh, from Brighton, via rural Oxfordshire). To be brief, it turned out that the roof box didn't fit on the new bars that we'd bought from Halfords. They were Thule's own brand, mind you, but the roof box must be 10 years old, and I guess designs change. My cousin had a couple of sets of roof bars that we tried, but neither of those fitted our car. So we returned to Scotland roof boxless.
Meanwhile, a nice follow-up phone call from Parcelforce to check we'd got the original set (top marks, Parcelforce), revealed this. Thule DID authorise the bars to be redirected from Scotland to Brighton, by overnight delivery. They DID arrive on Saturday. Sadly, they arrived at the address that Thule gave Parcelforce, which had the wrong house number on it. But Thule did, at least, try. I guess anyone can misread a 6 for a 4.
So now we still have no roof box, but (hopefully) a refund is on its way from Thule for the original set of roof bars, which are now in the hands of some puzzled people down the street from my mum.
.
A couple of further details of the story may amuse you, though.
We arrived at the village in Oxfordshire where my cousin lives, from whom we were reclaiming the roof box whilst conscientiously not finishing our sentences with prepositions. We'd set off from Brighton at 5.30am (it's a long way to Edinburgh, from Brighton, via rural Oxfordshire). To be brief, it turned out that the roof box didn't fit on the new bars that we'd bought from Halfords. They were Thule's own brand, mind you, but the roof box must be 10 years old, and I guess designs change. My cousin had a couple of sets of roof bars that we tried, but neither of those fitted our car. So we returned to Scotland roof boxless.
Meanwhile, a nice follow-up phone call from Parcelforce to check we'd got the original set (top marks, Parcelforce), revealed this. Thule DID authorise the bars to be redirected from Scotland to Brighton, by overnight delivery. They DID arrive on Saturday. Sadly, they arrived at the address that Thule gave Parcelforce, which had the wrong house number on it. But Thule did, at least, try. I guess anyone can misread a 6 for a 4.
So now we still have no roof box, but (hopefully) a refund is on its way from Thule for the original set of roof bars, which are now in the hands of some puzzled people down the street from my mum.
.
Saturday, August 10, 2013
Ode to a cocker spaniel
Thank you for your comments on dryers. Everybody loves a laundry post! On the basis of what you advised, and of what was on offer at Curry's, I've purchased a condenser Beko. Long may it dry! And I hope it doesn't cause me the need to vent. (See what I did there. But thinking about it, whatever happened to the word vent? It's seriously out of use now, and when I started blogging, people vented all the time. It was what made blogging great.)
When a cocker spaniel enters your life, there is a serious increase in earage in your daily life. As we walk Hector, we often sing that song:
Do your ears hang low?
Do they waggle to and fro?
Can you tie them in a know?
Can you tie them in a bow?
Can you swing them over your shoulder, like a regimental soldier?
Do your ears, hang, low?
It's a good song to walk to. Alternatively, one of us sits Hector on our lap, and acts it out with his ears. (No, it's not unkind, and let's face it, there's got to be some use for those appendages.)
9-yo and I have made up a couple more verses.
Do your ears hang high?
Do they point up to the sky?
Do they startle passers-by?
Can you flap them till you fly?
Could we make them into a hat, and then what would you think of that?
Do your ears, hang, high?
Do your ears twist round?
Can they reach down to the ground?
Do they make an awful sound?
Are they really world-renowned?
You'll be king of all things furry, and you'll never have to worry,
When your ears, are, crowned!
Gotta love a cocker spaniel!
.
When a cocker spaniel enters your life, there is a serious increase in earage in your daily life. As we walk Hector, we often sing that song:
Do your ears hang low?
Do they waggle to and fro?
Can you tie them in a know?
Can you tie them in a bow?
Can you swing them over your shoulder, like a regimental soldier?
Do your ears, hang, low?
It's a good song to walk to. Alternatively, one of us sits Hector on our lap, and acts it out with his ears. (No, it's not unkind, and let's face it, there's got to be some use for those appendages.)
9-yo and I have made up a couple more verses.
Do your ears hang high?
Do they point up to the sky?
Do they startle passers-by?
Can you flap them till you fly?
Could we make them into a hat, and then what would you think of that?
Do your ears, hang, high?
Do your ears twist round?
Can they reach down to the ground?
Do they make an awful sound?
Are they really world-renowned?
You'll be king of all things furry, and you'll never have to worry,
When your ears, are, crowned!
Gotta love a cocker spaniel!
.
Wednesday, August 7, 2013
Yes, it's another post about laundry, but I need your advice please
I'll be brief. (Yes, it happens... from time to time... occasionally...).
I need to buy a tumble dryer. They come in two types: condenser, and vented.
I am deeply, deeply prejudiced against condenser ones. This is because I have a washer-dryer, which is a complete nightmare as a dryer (though ok as a washer). I have ruined 3 loads of washing, and now never use it. Ever. It can't dry at low temps. It bakes the clothes. Seriously. You might as well put them in a rotisserie. It can only dry a tiny amount of stuff at a time. I hate it. With passion.
However, the new dryer will live in the garage, so it would be useful to have a condenser dryer rather than a vented one. Use of a vented one involves leaving the garage door open for the vent tube, which I have happily done for several years, in two different garages, but it's not ideal.
My question is this:
Are condenser dryers ok? Will they dry at low temps? Are condenser dryers a different breed from condenser combo washer-dryers?
(OK, that was 3 questions.)
Which is no use on the issue, so come on, Bloggy Friends. Enlighten me.
.
I need to buy a tumble dryer. They come in two types: condenser, and vented.
I am deeply, deeply prejudiced against condenser ones. This is because I have a washer-dryer, which is a complete nightmare as a dryer (though ok as a washer). I have ruined 3 loads of washing, and now never use it. Ever. It can't dry at low temps. It bakes the clothes. Seriously. You might as well put them in a rotisserie. It can only dry a tiny amount of stuff at a time. I hate it. With passion.
However, the new dryer will live in the garage, so it would be useful to have a condenser dryer rather than a vented one. Use of a vented one involves leaving the garage door open for the vent tube, which I have happily done for several years, in two different garages, but it's not ideal.
My question is this:
Are condenser dryers ok? Will they dry at low temps? Are condenser dryers a different breed from condenser combo washer-dryers?
(OK, that was 3 questions.)
Which is no use on the issue, so come on, Bloggy Friends. Enlighten me.
.
Tuesday, August 6, 2013
Killer dogs or miracle dogs?
The first paragraph of the lead story on the BBC news website today reads:
"The maximum jail sentence for the owners of dogs that attack and kill someone could be raised to life, under proposals for England and Wales."
On a first look, my attention was arrested. I do understand what it means, but I had to read it through 2 or 3 times to be absolutely sure the writer wasn't trying to say something else, rather extraordinary.
Photo courtesy of the BBC news website, and apologies to my brother for putting up a picture of a staffie in this context. I'm only copying the BBC...
.
"The maximum jail sentence for the owners of dogs that attack and kill someone could be raised to life, under proposals for England and Wales."
On a first look, my attention was arrested. I do understand what it means, but I had to read it through 2 or 3 times to be absolutely sure the writer wasn't trying to say something else, rather extraordinary.
Photo courtesy of the BBC news website, and apologies to my brother for putting up a picture of a staffie in this context. I'm only copying the BBC...
.
Wednesday, July 17, 2013
The Royal Yacht Britannia
I was approached by Superbreak, and offered free tickets to a choice of attractions. Thank you, Superbreak! It's a bit of a shock when your oldest child becomes 16, and you start having to pay for three adult tickets when you go out on a trip. And I certainly don't have anyone in the "under 5s go free" bracket. No. This is an expensive phase of family life, so I jumped at the chance of a freebie outing. I picked the Royal Yacht Britannia, one of Edinburgh's tourist highlights.
Going with a Superbreak ticket worked well. It was a big advantage not to have to wait in the queue, but to walk through the empty "pre-booked tickets" line. The tickets (for 3 adults and 2 children) would have cost me £51, which seems comparable to other tourist attractions.
Britannia was launched in 1953. For over 44 years, she served the Royal Family and the nation, travelling over one million miles to become possibly the most famous ship in the world. Britannia was the setting for official state visits, sparkling receptions, royal honeymoons, and relaxing family holidays. She was decommissioned in 1997, and brought to Leith Docks, where it was hoped that a major tourist attraction would help regenerate the area.
My initial impression of Britannia was that she is surprisingly small. There's plenty to see, though, and the audio guide tour lasts about an hour and a half. We took two versions of the audio guide: one for adults and one for children. Both were great - easy to listen to, informative without being too much, and the handsets were easy to operate.
Husband reckoned that it was one of the best tours he'd ever been on, and the children were engaged and interested (well, most of the time). We agreed that Britannia might not be so interesting for younger children. 9-yo pondered the question, and decided that it was most suitable for 8 and over.
It was fascinating to see the Royal quarters, and particularly to realise how our concept of luxury has been redefined in relatively recent years. The Queen herself was involved in the choice of the decor for the State Drawing Room, aiming for "country house comfort".
The bedrooms, including the one in which Prince Charles and Lady Diana honeymooned, are small and frankly rather spartan. One forgets how narrow a double bed was in 1981... I found it rather telling that the laundry, which had to do all the Royal washing as well as the crew uniforms (220 members of staff, some of whom needed 6 different changes of clothes in the same day), was never refitted. The machinery that was installed in 1953 was deemed to be fit for purpose until 1997. Ironic, really, that the Queen gave up Britannia as something of a gesture of economy.
I think Husband and I got more out of the visit than the kids. It's hard to explain to them what a previous era was like, and Britannia epitomises that era. When we were their ages, the Royal Family was remote, scarcely glimpsed. Seeing photos of them, happy and relaxed and the Queen wearing trousers (gasp), was strangely poignant. Yes, they were ordinary people, which we knew, of course, but never saw. For my children, used to seeing their own generation of Royals in jeans, visibly relaxed in the public eye, it was hard to understand that what Britannia offered a previous generation was so significant. 16-yo got it, though. As we left, he reflected on how sad the Queen must have been, when the decision was made (and I think it was her own decision) to decommission Britannia. "It had been her home", he said.
It's hard to describe the Royal quarters. The spaces are both regal and informal. Even the State Dining Room, used for state banquets when the Queen was on tour, felt small and intimate. On the walls are gifts that the Queen received on her tours, including a narwhal horn (who knew you could see a narwhal horn in Edinburgh?). There's also a whale rib, picked up by Prince Philip from a beach in Antarctica. I found these little details absolutely fascinating.
The tour also shows you round the crew's quarters. You can marvel at the cramped existence of the ratings (bunk and one small locker each), and the pristine formality of the officers' dining room, complete with impressive silverware ("No TV dinners for them!" said the children's audio guide). It is apparent that the crew loved the ship; there was a strong spirit of loyalty, and also fun. In one room, you can see the toy wombat that the crew used for their evening entertainment of wombat tennis, and a button from Lord Nelson's coat in a frame on the wall. That sums up a tour of Britannia: in the same room, details of the daily life of a much-loved working vessel, alongside history and grandeur. Britannia was an ambassador for Britain round the globe, hosting meetings and events on the world stage, but also the family's holiday ship, pottering round Scotland's Western Isles, with the family and Captain deciding each night where to go the following day, and good picnic sites noted down in the Captain's diary for use in future years.
The Britannia website says:
Going with a Superbreak ticket worked well. It was a big advantage not to have to wait in the queue, but to walk through the empty "pre-booked tickets" line. The tickets (for 3 adults and 2 children) would have cost me £51, which seems comparable to other tourist attractions.
Britannia was launched in 1953. For over 44 years, she served the Royal Family and the nation, travelling over one million miles to become possibly the most famous ship in the world. Britannia was the setting for official state visits, sparkling receptions, royal honeymoons, and relaxing family holidays. She was decommissioned in 1997, and brought to Leith Docks, where it was hoped that a major tourist attraction would help regenerate the area.
My initial impression of Britannia was that she is surprisingly small. There's plenty to see, though, and the audio guide tour lasts about an hour and a half. We took two versions of the audio guide: one for adults and one for children. Both were great - easy to listen to, informative without being too much, and the handsets were easy to operate.
Husband reckoned that it was one of the best tours he'd ever been on, and the children were engaged and interested (well, most of the time). We agreed that Britannia might not be so interesting for younger children. 9-yo pondered the question, and decided that it was most suitable for 8 and over.
It was fascinating to see the Royal quarters, and particularly to realise how our concept of luxury has been redefined in relatively recent years. The Queen herself was involved in the choice of the decor for the State Drawing Room, aiming for "country house comfort".
The bedrooms, including the one in which Prince Charles and Lady Diana honeymooned, are small and frankly rather spartan. One forgets how narrow a double bed was in 1981... I found it rather telling that the laundry, which had to do all the Royal washing as well as the crew uniforms (220 members of staff, some of whom needed 6 different changes of clothes in the same day), was never refitted. The machinery that was installed in 1953 was deemed to be fit for purpose until 1997. Ironic, really, that the Queen gave up Britannia as something of a gesture of economy.
I think Husband and I got more out of the visit than the kids. It's hard to explain to them what a previous era was like, and Britannia epitomises that era. When we were their ages, the Royal Family was remote, scarcely glimpsed. Seeing photos of them, happy and relaxed and the Queen wearing trousers (gasp), was strangely poignant. Yes, they were ordinary people, which we knew, of course, but never saw. For my children, used to seeing their own generation of Royals in jeans, visibly relaxed in the public eye, it was hard to understand that what Britannia offered a previous generation was so significant. 16-yo got it, though. As we left, he reflected on how sad the Queen must have been, when the decision was made (and I think it was her own decision) to decommission Britannia. "It had been her home", he said.
It's hard to describe the Royal quarters. The spaces are both regal and informal. Even the State Dining Room, used for state banquets when the Queen was on tour, felt small and intimate. On the walls are gifts that the Queen received on her tours, including a narwhal horn (who knew you could see a narwhal horn in Edinburgh?). There's also a whale rib, picked up by Prince Philip from a beach in Antarctica. I found these little details absolutely fascinating.
The tour also shows you round the crew's quarters. You can marvel at the cramped existence of the ratings (bunk and one small locker each), and the pristine formality of the officers' dining room, complete with impressive silverware ("No TV dinners for them!" said the children's audio guide). It is apparent that the crew loved the ship; there was a strong spirit of loyalty, and also fun. In one room, you can see the toy wombat that the crew used for their evening entertainment of wombat tennis, and a button from Lord Nelson's coat in a frame on the wall. That sums up a tour of Britannia: in the same room, details of the daily life of a much-loved working vessel, alongside history and grandeur. Britannia was an ambassador for Britain round the globe, hosting meetings and events on the world stage, but also the family's holiday ship, pottering round Scotland's Western Isles, with the family and Captain deciding each night where to go the following day, and good picnic sites noted down in the Captain's diary for use in future years.
The Britannia website says:
"The Royal Yacht Britannia was home to Her Majesty The Queen and the Royal Family for over 40 years, sailing over 1,000,000 miles around the world.
Now berthed in Edinburgh, you can follow in the footsteps of royalty to discover the heart and soul of this most special of Royal residences."
And I think you do just that.Wednesday, July 10, 2013
Having a dog is like having a small child
This is why:
But... there are moments when he is visibly enjoying life so much, that your heart is warmed, and you resolve to live in the moment like he does. At this point, you'd have a lovely picture of Hector, running over the grass, ears flapping, tongue hanging out, eyes bright. But that's another thing that's like having a small child: action photo opportunities are over so fast that you miss them all.
Instead, here is a video of his latest trick, because - and here's another illustration of the comparison - one can't help being ridiculously proud of every small achievement. (And this one is a double reason for maternal pride, since I had nothing to do with it. The children trained him.)
- You can kiss goodbye to lie-ins. You may know that it's the week-end, but the dog's body clock doesn't know that.
- You have to be consistent, if you want good behaviour. Being consistent is really hard. Really hard.
- You feel bad when you shout at him. But not bad enough that you don't do it again.
- You feel slightly aggrieved when you meet another dog with the same name as yours. Yes, it's a vote of confidence that it's a good choice of name, but harrumph, you don't want too many of them around.
- You feel guilty when it's the end of the day and you feel you haven't paid him enough attention.
- You hear yourself saying things to him in public in a slightly-too-loud voice, like "you're being very noisy... you're not usually like this...".
- It's embarrassing when he doesn't play nicely with other dogs, even though the other owners are very understanding and say things like "oh, he's just full of energy".
- Lots of things are "just a phase".
- There's always something in your pocket that, in an ideal world, wouldn't be there, but which you can't leave the house without. With a small child, it's a stock of manky tissues. With a dog, it's a few crumpled dog poo bags.
- His separation anxiety is both rather endearing (it's nice to be so needed) and very irritating (it's a drag to be so needed).
- Gardening is impossible. You really think he's going to occupy himself quietly elsewhere in the garden while you pay attention to plants?
- You spend more on his haircuts than on your own.
Instead, here is a video of his latest trick, because - and here's another illustration of the comparison - one can't help being ridiculously proud of every small achievement. (And this one is a double reason for maternal pride, since I had nothing to do with it. The children trained him.)
.
.
Friday, June 28, 2013
An abundance of cornflakes
"Cornflakes. Cornflakes. Cornflakes." Says 16-yo in his dressing gown, with a grin on his face, and a laugh in his voice, pointing at different locations in the kitchen.
"Cornflakes. And Special K." I reply, with self-justifying weight in my voice, and pointing to the two different varieties of Special K on the top of the fridge.
16-yo laughs. "I think I'll have toast instead".
I always have one item that I stock up on. It lodges itself in my memory as something we get through a lot of, and that we mustn't run out of. Then, when I'm going round the supermarket, I buy it. If I don't have a list, I buy it. Even if I have a list, I go off liste, and buy it. "I might as well stock up while I'm here", I think, as I pass it. Then I get home and see that my purchase was unnecessary. "Oh well. We'll use it up. Must remember not to get any next time." Remember for next time? Ha! No chance.
For a while, it was Ritz crackers. I think that one stemmed from my excitement when we got to America that they have Ritz crackers. Just like at home! The Ritz crackers phase lasted for a long while. It didn't really matter, as we had American-size storage options in our kitchen and utility room. If that near-miss tornado had struck our house, the ground would have been littered with red cardboard, and soggy wheat-based discs, but I guess the embarrassment of having the quirks of your kitchen cupboards revealed is unimportant in those situations.
Then it was lentils. For a short while. Turns out we don't get through lentils as quickly as I think we do. But they're so healthy that it's hard to walk past them in the aisle without feeling that stocking up on them is a good thing. And I had a recipe for sausages and lentils that I was convinced my children loved, even though they repeatedly told me they didn't. I wanted them to love it, and the sheer force of my desire was enough to lodge lentils in that "buy me" spot in my brain.
For the moment, it's cornflakes. Cornflakes are my domestic comfort blanket. Not to eat, but just to know I have them there. In the case of a nuclear armageddon, we'll at least have a good breakfast option.
The cornflakes are little more out of hand than usual, for two reasons. First, I haven't quite got used to my smaller kitchen, and those big packets of cereal, they're BIG. They don't fit in cupboards. So when I do stock up, it's all very visible. They have to stand like soldiers to attention on top of the fridge, or lurk in the utility room, annoyingly in front of the outside light switch, (though I'm not using that much at this time of year, and perhaps the Great Cornflake Plenty will have passed by the time the nights draw in again in the autumn. Autumn 2016, that is.)
Second, it was those dreaded multi-buy offers, combined with a voucher incentive. A 21st century housewife is powerless in the face of such weapons, especially the lethal combination of them both at once, in a pincer movement. I was at the till, and my trolley had come to about £4 less than the total needed to get a "Week 3" voucher, and I'd already got weeks 1 and 2. So I asked the cashier to wait a second, and rushed off to the spot, nearby, where I knew the cornflakes were on "two-for" offer, because I'd already put some in my trolley. I came back with two boxes. He scanned them through, but - because they were on special offer - they didn't tip the balance over the required total. I needed something else, but - under the pressure of the narrowing eyes of the queue behind me - I couldn't think of what else to get. My mind froze, then jumped for the simplest option. I went and got another couple of packets of cornflakes. We'll get through them, my inner voice whispered, down its well-worn neural pathways. It was only when I got home that I remembered just how big those bumper packs are. And just how many were already on the top of the fridge.
Cornflakes, in my defence, are good. They have a lot less sugar than most other cereals, even the diet-y ones. Special K, for example, has lots of sugar in it, particularly if you get the packets with added flakes of suspiciously highly coloured, edible dried substance, which might or might not once have been fruit.
I feel like the fourth little pig, who built her house out of cornflake packets. I know that when the big bad wolf comes, the cornflake bricks will probably not stand his huffing and puffing, but at least he'll be distracted by the prospect of a vitamin-enriched snack while we escape.
What about you? Do you hoard food? If so, what kind?
"Cornflakes. And Special K." I reply, with self-justifying weight in my voice, and pointing to the two different varieties of Special K on the top of the fridge.
16-yo laughs. "I think I'll have toast instead".
I always have one item that I stock up on. It lodges itself in my memory as something we get through a lot of, and that we mustn't run out of. Then, when I'm going round the supermarket, I buy it. If I don't have a list, I buy it. Even if I have a list, I go off liste, and buy it. "I might as well stock up while I'm here", I think, as I pass it. Then I get home and see that my purchase was unnecessary. "Oh well. We'll use it up. Must remember not to get any next time." Remember for next time? Ha! No chance.
For a while, it was Ritz crackers. I think that one stemmed from my excitement when we got to America that they have Ritz crackers. Just like at home! The Ritz crackers phase lasted for a long while. It didn't really matter, as we had American-size storage options in our kitchen and utility room. If that near-miss tornado had struck our house, the ground would have been littered with red cardboard, and soggy wheat-based discs, but I guess the embarrassment of having the quirks of your kitchen cupboards revealed is unimportant in those situations.
Then it was lentils. For a short while. Turns out we don't get through lentils as quickly as I think we do. But they're so healthy that it's hard to walk past them in the aisle without feeling that stocking up on them is a good thing. And I had a recipe for sausages and lentils that I was convinced my children loved, even though they repeatedly told me they didn't. I wanted them to love it, and the sheer force of my desire was enough to lodge lentils in that "buy me" spot in my brain.
For the moment, it's cornflakes. Cornflakes are my domestic comfort blanket. Not to eat, but just to know I have them there. In the case of a nuclear armageddon, we'll at least have a good breakfast option.
The cornflakes are little more out of hand than usual, for two reasons. First, I haven't quite got used to my smaller kitchen, and those big packets of cereal, they're BIG. They don't fit in cupboards. So when I do stock up, it's all very visible. They have to stand like soldiers to attention on top of the fridge, or lurk in the utility room, annoyingly in front of the outside light switch, (though I'm not using that much at this time of year, and perhaps the Great Cornflake Plenty will have passed by the time the nights draw in again in the autumn. Autumn 2016, that is.)
Second, it was those dreaded multi-buy offers, combined with a voucher incentive. A 21st century housewife is powerless in the face of such weapons, especially the lethal combination of them both at once, in a pincer movement. I was at the till, and my trolley had come to about £4 less than the total needed to get a "Week 3" voucher, and I'd already got weeks 1 and 2. So I asked the cashier to wait a second, and rushed off to the spot, nearby, where I knew the cornflakes were on "two-for" offer, because I'd already put some in my trolley. I came back with two boxes. He scanned them through, but - because they were on special offer - they didn't tip the balance over the required total. I needed something else, but - under the pressure of the narrowing eyes of the queue behind me - I couldn't think of what else to get. My mind froze, then jumped for the simplest option. I went and got another couple of packets of cornflakes. We'll get through them, my inner voice whispered, down its well-worn neural pathways. It was only when I got home that I remembered just how big those bumper packs are. And just how many were already on the top of the fridge.
Cornflakes, in my defence, are good. They have a lot less sugar than most other cereals, even the diet-y ones. Special K, for example, has lots of sugar in it, particularly if you get the packets with added flakes of suspiciously highly coloured, edible dried substance, which might or might not once have been fruit.
I feel like the fourth little pig, who built her house out of cornflake packets. I know that when the big bad wolf comes, the cornflake bricks will probably not stand his huffing and puffing, but at least he'll be distracted by the prospect of a vitamin-enriched snack while we escape.
What about you? Do you hoard food? If so, what kind?
Labels:
16-yo,
cornflakes,
cultural differences,
food,
shopping,
tornadoes
Saturday, June 22, 2013
She who would valiant be
Why is being a parent of a teenager such a tough call these days?
We want the instruction manual. Remember those early days with a baby, when you thought "why doesn't it come with an instruction manual?". It's like that all over again. I don't know if it's our education system, or our nanny state, or just human nature, but it always feels like there's a right way of doing something, and our job is to find it. We know this isn't true, but somehow it feels like it is.
Where to look for the ultimate advice?
We want the instruction manual. Remember those early days with a baby, when you thought "why doesn't it come with an instruction manual?". It's like that all over again. I don't know if it's our education system, or our nanny state, or just human nature, but it always feels like there's a right way of doing something, and our job is to find it. We know this isn't true, but somehow it feels like it is.
Where to look for the ultimate advice?
- A book - but which one to choose?
- A bunch of friends - but they all have slightly differing opinions, and there's that dangerous thing of asking a friend, and then deciding to ignore their advice.
- The science - which can help (folic acid during pregnancy, that was an easy one, once they'd worked out that the advice should be just to take a tablet and not to try to eat a small field of broccoli or spinach every day - which actually was the advice when it first came out and I should know because I was pregnant during that tiny window before the advice changed to a more manageable course of action), but can also be seriously anxiety-inducing (MMR jabs, anyone?), and disempowering (Vitamin K jabs for newborns - have they decided whether that is risk-free yet, or are parents still having to decide between the rare bruising disease and the unproven link with some childhood cancers?)
- Parents - can be complicated.
- Blogs - always good, but they don't know your children. Only you really know your children.
- Intuition - usually good, but I think we're a generation of parents who have totally lost faith in our own intuion.
- The Waltons. Yes. There's always a good parenting tip or two on The Waltons, and my friend has the complete box set readily available for borrowing. I am well set up.
Seriously, though. It is hard to be a parent of a teenager, and I'll tell you why. Because it plays on our own insecurities and fears. I'm guessing that few of us reached mature adult life (and I'm talking mid-twenties here) without some bumps and scrapes. Even though we may know that those were all part of a process, and though we may know that people get through and emerge ok, we are also hard-wired to protect our off-spring, and somehow we want them to have a smooth ride. Because if we had the instruction manual, and followed the instructions, then they would. Or so says the false voice in our heads.
I have found the whole Duke of Edinburgh thing very hard to navigate through....
At this point, I wrote a couple of paragraphs, explaining the exact circumstances. Then I realised that all I was doing was justifying myself to you. So I went back and deleted them. That's the very point I'm trying to make. I feel so out of my depth when I think about how to go about parenting this son of mine, that I just slip into self-justification mode. Because I don't want to fail. I want that instruction book, I want to follow it, and then no-one will be able to say I haven't done my best. But meanwhile, instead, I have a head full of questions that go round and round, and the gist of them is this: Have I prepared him enough? Have I done too much for him? How have I done, tightrope-walking that line between being over-protective and under-protective?
It brings back all those feelings that we went through (I say "we" because I don't think it's just me... I've read enough blogs about this...) when we were trying to do well with our babies and toddlers. That time in the park when your toddler fell over, and you picked him up, and your friend said "he needs to learn to get up on his own... otherwise he'll be too dependent on you". Or the GP who told you you were over-reacting when you thought your child was ill. Or that new mum group where it turned out that everyone else was doing x and you were doing y, and you'd been quite happy doing y until that moment, and then you went home and tried to do x instead, and it didn't work, and you didn't draw the conclusion that y was fine after all, but you felt like somehow you were getting it all wrong, and that it was your fault, and that you were letting your baby down.
16-yo is in London today (and this is one of the complications, that he arrives back at 10.00pm tonight and then goes off on the Duke of Ed trip tomorrow at 8.00am). He's been there for 3 nights, meeting up with a group from his old high school in America, who are on a trip to Europe. Before he went, I was so full of self-congratulation at how hands-off I am as a parent, and how he will find his own way and learn from his mistakes, and just what could go wrong, honestly? While he was away, all that fell by the wayside, and I was checking my phone for texts all the time, cursing the bad reception that meant a call from him dropped just as I answered it, sneakily texting his aunt who met him for lunch, to see how he was doing... I so don't want to be an anxious mother, and I so am.
I think he'll do fine, though. I put him on the train, having bought him a cup of tea and helped him find his carriage and seat. (You forget that a seat reservation isn't an obvious thing, to those who've never encountered one before...). As I walked away down the platform, I felt a tap on my shoulder. It was him. "Mum, you're holding my tickets!" And I was. In under a minute, he'd realised the lack of tickets, tried to phone me, tried to text me, and then decided to run after me. Good call. Top marks for competence. I think he'll do fine.
And the title? Well, you do have to be valiant, to be a parent of a teenager.
.
Labels:
16-yo,
Duke of Edinburgh,
faith,
motherhood,
parenthood
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
He who would valiant be
I still feel I'm new to this "parenting of teenagers" lark, but oldest is 16, so I suppose I have a certain amount of experience. Can I pass on to those of you who may be embarking on the journey one small word of warning? Forewarned is forearmed, and all that. There is something you need to know about, a beast that rears its ugly head from time to time during the teenage years. Learn to recognise the monster, and when you see him, turn tail, run, flee, as if your sanity depended on it (it may, in reality, do so). Those who stand and fight are courageous, but usually live to regret it.
The beast seems innocent enough. It starts off as a "letter home". The warning sign is this (take it from a seasoned recipient of the "letter home"): the letter home includes words such as personal development, initiative-taking, leadership-training, challenging, team-building or responsibility. These are the tell-tale indicators of the poison within.
Yes, dear Bloggy Friends, it's the Duke of Edinburgh Award Scheme Expedition. Enough of a monster in its own right, with its kit list, and its early morning start, and its production of dirty laundry mounds the size of mythical giants. But, worst of all, let it be known among you brave warriors of the teenage parenting cause, this challenge, this adventure, this quest, is not your child's but your own.
Thanks, Prince Phillip. Thanks very much. You thought you were giving young people the chance to flex their muscles, to develop their personalities, to grow in character. But, bless your recuperating cotton socks, you couldn't have foreseen how the way young people are treated would change, and that in fact you were creating a challenge of gargantuan dimensions for parents.
It starts with the letter home, and the request for a cheque. (Do some kids have to earn the money to pay for these trips themselves, or do all we parents just cough up?)
Then there's the kit list. This is the parent's first challenge. How do you get the kit list? Some parents, sneaky devils, ask the school, or download it from the school website, or even look it out from the pile of paper that arrived home at the end of the previous term. But there are noble saints, valiant champions of the cause of "teaching your young person leadership skills", who stand firm, and request the list, repeatedly, from their off-spring. Was it Don Quixote who tilted at windmills? I know how he felt. An honourably-intentioned, but fruitless, activity.
Then the second challenge. Buying the items on the kit list. I'm told there are those who go to shops and do so. Others, we of strong mind and valour, talk to our child of "taking responsibility", and set mind-taxing challenges such as "when can we find a time for you to come shopping with me?" We have close to our heart, the development of our child's problem-solving skills.
These foes must be vanquished, before the young adventurer can move onto the most difficult obstacle he has yet encountered. Packing. You must metaphorically hold his hand, as he advances forth into the bedroom, to extract the rucksack from the deep monster's lair known as "the wardrobe". Then you must stand sentinel, warding off maleficient younger siblings, as the young knight lays his belongings out on the floor, and grapples with the task of fitting them all into the rucksack. He who displays moral stature will succeed. Others will be distracted from the task by their trusty iPods, and expect the packing fairies (who they still believe in) to do the deed for them.
I could go on, but you get my drift. This is the second such trip my son has been on. Apparently they are "designed to give opportunities to develop leadership skills and show responsibility", but it's all a huge myth. The teachers and parents run around getting them ready. They jump into lochs, or go abseiiling, or climb over an obstacle course, but it doesn't teach them anything to do with responsibility. It teaches them abseiling and obstacle courses. Every time I try and inject a bit of "taking responsibility" into it, I just end up with a ridiculous dilemma, such as today's which is "do I let my son go off hiking in the Scottish Highlands without walking boots that fit, and learn through blisters and pain that it might have been better to have made preparations, or do I figure out a way of buying him some boots even though he now doesn't have time to get to a shop, and make it all ok for him on this occasion, thus implying that if you don't make preparations, it doesn't matter because someone will bail you out?" Neither seems a very good option.
I tell you, if I was King for a day, I could design an award scheme which would teach young people plenty of useful skills. It would involve
The beast seems innocent enough. It starts off as a "letter home". The warning sign is this (take it from a seasoned recipient of the "letter home"): the letter home includes words such as personal development, initiative-taking, leadership-training, challenging, team-building or responsibility. These are the tell-tale indicators of the poison within.
Yes, dear Bloggy Friends, it's the Duke of Edinburgh Award Scheme Expedition. Enough of a monster in its own right, with its kit list, and its early morning start, and its production of dirty laundry mounds the size of mythical giants. But, worst of all, let it be known among you brave warriors of the teenage parenting cause, this challenge, this adventure, this quest, is not your child's but your own.
Thanks, Prince Phillip. Thanks very much. You thought you were giving young people the chance to flex their muscles, to develop their personalities, to grow in character. But, bless your recuperating cotton socks, you couldn't have foreseen how the way young people are treated would change, and that in fact you were creating a challenge of gargantuan dimensions for parents.
It starts with the letter home, and the request for a cheque. (Do some kids have to earn the money to pay for these trips themselves, or do all we parents just cough up?)
Then there's the kit list. This is the parent's first challenge. How do you get the kit list? Some parents, sneaky devils, ask the school, or download it from the school website, or even look it out from the pile of paper that arrived home at the end of the previous term. But there are noble saints, valiant champions of the cause of "teaching your young person leadership skills", who stand firm, and request the list, repeatedly, from their off-spring. Was it Don Quixote who tilted at windmills? I know how he felt. An honourably-intentioned, but fruitless, activity.
Then the second challenge. Buying the items on the kit list. I'm told there are those who go to shops and do so. Others, we of strong mind and valour, talk to our child of "taking responsibility", and set mind-taxing challenges such as "when can we find a time for you to come shopping with me?" We have close to our heart, the development of our child's problem-solving skills.
These foes must be vanquished, before the young adventurer can move onto the most difficult obstacle he has yet encountered. Packing. You must metaphorically hold his hand, as he advances forth into the bedroom, to extract the rucksack from the deep monster's lair known as "the wardrobe". Then you must stand sentinel, warding off maleficient younger siblings, as the young knight lays his belongings out on the floor, and grapples with the task of fitting them all into the rucksack. He who displays moral stature will succeed. Others will be distracted from the task by their trusty iPods, and expect the packing fairies (who they still believe in) to do the deed for them.
I could go on, but you get my drift. This is the second such trip my son has been on. Apparently they are "designed to give opportunities to develop leadership skills and show responsibility", but it's all a huge myth. The teachers and parents run around getting them ready. They jump into lochs, or go abseiiling, or climb over an obstacle course, but it doesn't teach them anything to do with responsibility. It teaches them abseiling and obstacle courses. Every time I try and inject a bit of "taking responsibility" into it, I just end up with a ridiculous dilemma, such as today's which is "do I let my son go off hiking in the Scottish Highlands without walking boots that fit, and learn through blisters and pain that it might have been better to have made preparations, or do I figure out a way of buying him some boots even though he now doesn't have time to get to a shop, and make it all ok for him on this occasion, thus implying that if you don't make preparations, it doesn't matter because someone will bail you out?" Neither seems a very good option.
I tell you, if I was King for a day, I could design an award scheme which would teach young people plenty of useful skills. It would involve
- several hours of picking up dirty laundry from bedroom floors, followed by several hours of putting clean laundry in drawers
- workshops on how to unload a dishwasher (with those who show exceptional ability given further training in how to unload a dishwasher without even being asked)
- lock-in sessions where they are kept in an enclosed space with younger siblings and not allowed out until they have worked out how to share the space without aggravating those siblings, physically, mentally or emotionally
- trips to the corner shop with a pound coin to buy a pint of milk, including compulsory use of the pedestrian crossing, and with optional instruction in how to complete the task cheerfully and without implying to others that you are being asked to trek across half the city
- and finally - but mind you, this would only be for the gold award - how to get ready for a school trip without stressing out your mother.
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
Interesting post about being an expat
Alexia, an expat mum living in London, who blogs at A Mum in London, has collated a number of views of the best and worst about expat life. Definitely worth a visit - and see if you can guess what I said, before you click over.
.
.
Monday, June 10, 2013
House
As you'll know if you read this post, my mother has just moved out of her house, downsizing and moving near to my brother. She and my father moved into that house in 1963, so it has been the family home throughout all my life. It's a characterful old house, a former farmhouse, in a beautiful setting. I was down there for a week over half-term, with Husband and the children, and it was a good week, albeit a heavy one. I wrote some reflections.
Look. There's me. I'm being born. November. Half past six in the evening. I'm being delivered by my grandmother and the community midwife. My parents' bedroom. Two windows, one facing west, one facing south. I wonder what my first sight is, when I open my eyes. The midwife? My grandmother? My mother's smiling face? Or the brown wooden railings of the bedhead? That bedhead is still there. Maybe that bedhead, which now sports a sticky label "Bedroom 1", was the very first thing I ever saw.
Look. There's me. I'm two and a half, and my brother is being born in his turn, in my parents' bedroom. My grandmother is here again, and the community midwife, but they can't both be with my mother. My grandmother has to spend precious moments with me. I know something is going on, and I want to know what. I want to see. I want to go into my mother's room. I won't settle in my own bed. There's my grandmother, singing to me, stroking me, outwardly lulling me gently, but inwardly hard urging me to sleep.
Look. There's me. I'm sitting up in the big Silver Cross pram, opposite my brother. You can take a square section of the floor out, leaving a well for a child to put their feet when they sit upright. My feet are in the square, but so are his, and I'm kicking him. It's fun, but I'm annoyed with him too. My mother is stopping us. "Behave, or we won't go out." This is my earliest memory.
Look. There's me. I'm at school now. I'm in my blue school uniform, and I have a brown satchel, which I like, but not as much as my friend Catherine's one. Mine is a dull brown, but hers is a shiny chestnutty brown. On summer days, we walk home from school through the orchards, kicking the cut grass with our school shoes.
Look. There's me. I'm jumping around on straw bales in the farm with my brothers, sister and cousins. We know we're not allowed to climb on the machinery, or go into the cow pens. But we're allowed on the straw bales in the barn, and there's a lovely shivery feeling of danger and strangeness in that big barn, which is so empty and echoey and huge, and it always feels as if we're naughty interlopers when any of the farmhands come by. They know us, though, and leave us alone. My mother rings a bell out of the kitchen window when it's time to go home.
Look. There's me. I'm doing my O' levels and I'm sitting at my desk, working. The garden is hot outside, and I can hear the lazy hum of a bumble bee as it drones past the window. I have the Capital Radio Daily Top 10 on the radio, which I let myself listen to every day, before turning the radio off to concentrate more on my books. Just under my window is the porch over the front door, and when I was younger, I used to think it fun to go out of my bedroom window onto the porch, and into the bathroom from there. Of course it wasn't allowed. We did it anyway.
Look. There's me. I've just moved to London, and started work. The city is big and lonely, and I feel I have no idea what I'm doing. I don't really understand my job, but I'm meant to be good at it, as a graduate trainee. I come home often for Sunday lunch, and somehow the comfort of it makes Monday morning less intimidating.
Look. There's me. It's the 'do' after my father's funeral, and we're outside in the garden in the sunshine - which is odd, come to think of it, since it's early March. I don't really want to talk to anyone, but I have to. Someone asks me whether my mother will stay on in the house. What a strange question to ask someone at a funeral.
Look. There's me. I'm sitting in the garden in the sunshine, more than 41 weeks pregnant with my first child. That last contraction made me shift in my chair. This really is it. My mother has friends round, and I don't want to be dramatic, but my sister-in-law notices and, eyes wide for effect, mouths "GO HOME!" at me.
Look. There's me. We've been back from America for long summer weeks, based at the house, and returning to it from trips elsewhere round the UK. We're all packed up and the taxi to the airport will be here soon, and I'm doing 'the sweep'. I walk through each room, eyes travelling across every flat surface, including the floor, looking for stray items. I think I'm pretty good at the sweep, opening drawers, crouching down to peer under beds, but we always leave a few items: laundry in the airing cupboard, favourite toys under pillows, books under piles of newspapers. My mother holds them as hostage till the next visit. I hate the sweep now. Gone are the days when we're only heading off a few hours away in the car, when the pride of maternal efficiency is the main emotion. Now I can't even meet my mother's eyes as she greets me in the hall with her "Got everything? Well done! You're so organised! " It feels like I'm sweeping away the whole summer, leaving it behind us as we return to our lives in America. Our other lives.
Look. There's me. Back for another summer. Sitting in the garden with Paradise. She's a blogging friend, and I've got to know her so well through emailing, pouring out our expat woes, me from America, she from Albania. Here we are, meeting in the flesh, in real life. We share a long, lazy afternoon, in the sun, our children happily playing together. We'll be heading off in different directions, me to the West, Paradise to the East, but for these few hours, the strings of our lives knot comfortably together, a fixed physical event that tethers the part of my life that is lived in cyberspace.
Look. There's me. I'm sitting on the floor with my mother, sorting a box of old toy cars. I'm taking a few, and we're dividing the rest between two bags, one for the charity shop, the other for the rubbish. I take my favourites, and then the ones I can see my mother is struggling to part with. How do you sift and prioritise memories? These Matchbox cars are the ones that I used to pick for my team, zooming them round the house with my brothers, wearing out the knees of our trousers. I know the feel of them in my hand. I know which doors open, and which wheels are missing. They all had names, but I can't remember those. My children come into the room. "Oh, the cars! Are you giving away these?" The cars are holders of two generations of playtime memories.
Look. There's me. I'm lighting the candles on my son's 16th birthday cake. We're telling him the story of the day he was born, how I sat in the sunshine with my mother and her friends. It feels like a strand of life has joined up into a full circle. I think of two friends who have sons with birthdays on this same date. One is in America whose son is 11, and the other a blogging friend whose son is 2. I reflect how my life has oozed out in various directions, from this place. Sixteen years. And here we are again. Only one more day in this house.
Look. There's me. I'm getting into bed beside Husband. I whisper "This is the last night we'll ever spend in this house", but he's asleep. I bury my face into the back of his warm neck and drape my arm over his body, and I think to myself that I'll never manage to get to sleep. But then it's morning.
Look. There's me. I'm doing the final sweep, and I'm bidding farewell to the house. I go into each room, and say goodbye, out loud. No hostages this time.
Look. There's me. We're in the car, and I'm crying, and I can't stop. I wave out of the window, because that's the ritual. "Do the beep-beeps" says one of the children from the back, and Husband beeps the horn twice. In the wing mirror, I can see my mother waving, and there's something deeply, deeply familiar about that exact way she's standing, the angle of her arm, the movement of it, the position of her head to one side... And the house, standing behind.
.
Look. There's me. I'm being born. November. Half past six in the evening. I'm being delivered by my grandmother and the community midwife. My parents' bedroom. Two windows, one facing west, one facing south. I wonder what my first sight is, when I open my eyes. The midwife? My grandmother? My mother's smiling face? Or the brown wooden railings of the bedhead? That bedhead is still there. Maybe that bedhead, which now sports a sticky label "Bedroom 1", was the very first thing I ever saw.
Look. There's me. I'm two and a half, and my brother is being born in his turn, in my parents' bedroom. My grandmother is here again, and the community midwife, but they can't both be with my mother. My grandmother has to spend precious moments with me. I know something is going on, and I want to know what. I want to see. I want to go into my mother's room. I won't settle in my own bed. There's my grandmother, singing to me, stroking me, outwardly lulling me gently, but inwardly hard urging me to sleep.
Look. There's me. I'm sitting up in the big Silver Cross pram, opposite my brother. You can take a square section of the floor out, leaving a well for a child to put their feet when they sit upright. My feet are in the square, but so are his, and I'm kicking him. It's fun, but I'm annoyed with him too. My mother is stopping us. "Behave, or we won't go out." This is my earliest memory.
Look. There's me. I'm at school now. I'm in my blue school uniform, and I have a brown satchel, which I like, but not as much as my friend Catherine's one. Mine is a dull brown, but hers is a shiny chestnutty brown. On summer days, we walk home from school through the orchards, kicking the cut grass with our school shoes.
Look. There's me. I'm jumping around on straw bales in the farm with my brothers, sister and cousins. We know we're not allowed to climb on the machinery, or go into the cow pens. But we're allowed on the straw bales in the barn, and there's a lovely shivery feeling of danger and strangeness in that big barn, which is so empty and echoey and huge, and it always feels as if we're naughty interlopers when any of the farmhands come by. They know us, though, and leave us alone. My mother rings a bell out of the kitchen window when it's time to go home.
Look. There's me. I'm doing my O' levels and I'm sitting at my desk, working. The garden is hot outside, and I can hear the lazy hum of a bumble bee as it drones past the window. I have the Capital Radio Daily Top 10 on the radio, which I let myself listen to every day, before turning the radio off to concentrate more on my books. Just under my window is the porch over the front door, and when I was younger, I used to think it fun to go out of my bedroom window onto the porch, and into the bathroom from there. Of course it wasn't allowed. We did it anyway.
Look. There's me. I've just moved to London, and started work. The city is big and lonely, and I feel I have no idea what I'm doing. I don't really understand my job, but I'm meant to be good at it, as a graduate trainee. I come home often for Sunday lunch, and somehow the comfort of it makes Monday morning less intimidating.
Look. There's me. It's the 'do' after my father's funeral, and we're outside in the garden in the sunshine - which is odd, come to think of it, since it's early March. I don't really want to talk to anyone, but I have to. Someone asks me whether my mother will stay on in the house. What a strange question to ask someone at a funeral.
Look. There's me. I'm sitting in the garden in the sunshine, more than 41 weeks pregnant with my first child. That last contraction made me shift in my chair. This really is it. My mother has friends round, and I don't want to be dramatic, but my sister-in-law notices and, eyes wide for effect, mouths "GO HOME!" at me.
Look. There's me. We've been back from America for long summer weeks, based at the house, and returning to it from trips elsewhere round the UK. We're all packed up and the taxi to the airport will be here soon, and I'm doing 'the sweep'. I walk through each room, eyes travelling across every flat surface, including the floor, looking for stray items. I think I'm pretty good at the sweep, opening drawers, crouching down to peer under beds, but we always leave a few items: laundry in the airing cupboard, favourite toys under pillows, books under piles of newspapers. My mother holds them as hostage till the next visit. I hate the sweep now. Gone are the days when we're only heading off a few hours away in the car, when the pride of maternal efficiency is the main emotion. Now I can't even meet my mother's eyes as she greets me in the hall with her "Got everything? Well done! You're so organised! " It feels like I'm sweeping away the whole summer, leaving it behind us as we return to our lives in America. Our other lives.
Look. There's me. Back for another summer. Sitting in the garden with Paradise. She's a blogging friend, and I've got to know her so well through emailing, pouring out our expat woes, me from America, she from Albania. Here we are, meeting in the flesh, in real life. We share a long, lazy afternoon, in the sun, our children happily playing together. We'll be heading off in different directions, me to the West, Paradise to the East, but for these few hours, the strings of our lives knot comfortably together, a fixed physical event that tethers the part of my life that is lived in cyberspace.
Look. There's me. I'm sitting on the floor with my mother, sorting a box of old toy cars. I'm taking a few, and we're dividing the rest between two bags, one for the charity shop, the other for the rubbish. I take my favourites, and then the ones I can see my mother is struggling to part with. How do you sift and prioritise memories? These Matchbox cars are the ones that I used to pick for my team, zooming them round the house with my brothers, wearing out the knees of our trousers. I know the feel of them in my hand. I know which doors open, and which wheels are missing. They all had names, but I can't remember those. My children come into the room. "Oh, the cars! Are you giving away these?" The cars are holders of two generations of playtime memories.
Look. There's me. I'm lighting the candles on my son's 16th birthday cake. We're telling him the story of the day he was born, how I sat in the sunshine with my mother and her friends. It feels like a strand of life has joined up into a full circle. I think of two friends who have sons with birthdays on this same date. One is in America whose son is 11, and the other a blogging friend whose son is 2. I reflect how my life has oozed out in various directions, from this place. Sixteen years. And here we are again. Only one more day in this house.
Look. There's me. I'm getting into bed beside Husband. I whisper "This is the last night we'll ever spend in this house", but he's asleep. I bury my face into the back of his warm neck and drape my arm over his body, and I think to myself that I'll never manage to get to sleep. But then it's morning.
Look. There's me. I'm doing the final sweep, and I'm bidding farewell to the house. I go into each room, and say goodbye, out loud. No hostages this time.
Look. There's me. We're in the car, and I'm crying, and I can't stop. I wave out of the window, because that's the ritual. "Do the beep-beeps" says one of the children from the back, and Husband beeps the horn twice. In the wing mirror, I can see my mother waving, and there's something deeply, deeply familiar about that exact way she's standing, the angle of her arm, the movement of it, the position of her head to one side... And the house, standing behind.
.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)








.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)





